Phenotypic variation in growth and biofilm formation of Leuconostoc spp. from sugar beet factories

<i>Leuconostoc</i> bacteria are common colonizers of sugar crop processing environments, resulting in sucrose losses and the formation of exopolysaccharides (EPS) and biofilms that can lead to reduced product quality and higher operational costs. Although <i>Leuconostoc</i> species are present in abundance, strain-specific differences in biofilm formation, EPS production, and matrix structure are not well understood. In this study, nine sugar beet factory-derived <i>Leuconostoc</i> isolates were grown and evaluated using a combination of batch adherence and continuous flow biofilm bioreactor assays, cryo scanning electron microscopy (SEM), EPS quantification, viscosity testing, and growth rate analysis to determine which phenotypes correlate with biofilm formation. The results from the adherence batch-phase biofilms indicated significant phenotypic variation among isolates, with the highest bacterial proliferation by <i>L. suionicum</i> BSDF25-7 and BSDF48-3, exceeding 5 × 10<sup>8</sup> colony-forming units/cm<sup>2</sup> on stainless steel coupons. In contrast, the highest biofilm biomass accumulated was BSDF2-3 and BSDF25-7, indicating differences in cell proliferation and biofilm matrix structure. CryoSEM imaging revealed diverse biofilm structures, such as silo-like aggregates and patchy surface colonization, indicating strain-specific extracellular matrix assembly strategies. Flow-through biofilm bioreactor assays further identified BSDF2-3 and BSDF5-1 as predominant biofilm formers with the highest CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> present at 4 × 10<sup>8</sup> and 1 × 10<sup>9</sup>, respectively, while BSDF2-3 accumulated twice the biofilm biomass as BSDF5-1. <i>Leuconostoc</i> strains BSDF25-7 and BSDF48-3 produced high levels of dextran and EPS, while BSDF2-3 consistently formed dense, shear-resistant biofilms despite slow growth and low EPS levels, suggesting the possibility of alternative matrix composition or structural adaptations. Individual <i>Leuconostoc</i> strains adapt uniquely, adding to the functional diversity of biofilms that impact formation, matrix complexity, and resistance to environmental stressors. This study furthers our understanding of EPS and growth phenotypes involved in biofilm formation while providing a working model, enabling the development of future antimicrobial mitigation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1745936
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Enzyme Production and Characterization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phenotypic variation in growth and biofilm formation of Leuconostoc spp. from sugar beet factories

Md Nayeem Hasan Kashem, Sanjay S. Joshi, Evan Terrell, Sunghyun Nam et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Microbiology
Enzyme Production and Characterization
27.96
article

Phenotypic variation in growth and biofilm formation of Leuconostoc spp. from sugar beet factories

Md Nayeem Hasan Kashem, Sanjay S. Joshi, Evan Terrell, Sunghyun Nam, Tia Zimmerman, Johnathan Salter, Gillian O. Bruni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Leuconostoc</i> bacteria are common colonizers of sugar crop processing environments, resulting in sucrose losses and the formation of exopolysaccharides (EPS) and biofilms that can lead to reduced product quality and higher operational costs. Although <i>Leuconostoc</i> species are present in abundance, strain-specific differences in biofilm formation, EPS production, and matrix structure are not well understood. In this study, nine sugar beet factory-derived <i>Leuconostoc</i> isolates were grown and evaluated using a combination of batch adherence and continuous flow biofilm bioreactor assays, cryo scanning electron microscopy (SEM), EPS quantification, viscosity testing, and growth rate analysis to determine which phenotypes correlate with biofilm formation. The results from the adherence batch-phase biofilms indicated significant phenotypic variation among isolates, with the highest bacterial proliferation by <i>L. suionicum</i> BSDF25-7 and BSDF48-3, exceeding 5 × 10<sup>8</sup> colony-forming units/cm<sup>2</sup> on stainless steel coupons. In contrast, the highest biofilm biomass accumulated was BSDF2-3 and BSDF25-7, indicating differences in cell proliferation and biofilm matrix structure. CryoSEM imaging revealed diverse biofilm structures, such as silo-like aggregates and patchy surface colonization, indicating strain-specific extracellular matrix assembly strategies. Flow-through biofilm bioreactor assays further identified BSDF2-3 and BSDF5-1 as predominant biofilm formers with the highest CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> present at 4 × 10<sup>8</sup> and 1 × 10<sup>9</sup>, respectively, while BSDF2-3 accumulated twice the biofilm biomass as BSDF5-1. <i>Leuconostoc</i> strains BSDF25-7 and BSDF48-3 produced high levels of dextran and EPS, while BSDF2-3 consistently formed dense, shear-resistant biofilms despite slow growth and low EPS levels, suggesting the possibility of alternative matrix composition or structural adaptations. Individual <i>Leuconostoc</i> strains adapt uniquely, adding to the functional diversity of biofilms that impact formation, matrix complexity, and resistance to environmental stressors. This study furthers our understanding of EPS and growth phenotypes involved in biofilm formation while providing a working model, enabling the development of future antimicrobial mitigation strategies.

Frontiers in MicrobiologyVol. 16
Agricultural Research Service (US), United States Department of Energy (US), Southern Regional Research Center (US), Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Enzyme Production and Characterization
27.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.