Process Modeling and Techno-economic Analysis of an Integrated Large-Scale CO <sub>2</sub> /CO Electroreduction Plant to Produce C <sub>2+</sub> Products

CO<sub>2</sub> feedstock obtained from point sources, such as chemical industries or fossil fuel-based power plants, typically contains gaseous contaminants such as SO <sub><i>x</i></sub> , NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> , H<sub>2</sub>S, and COS, which can be detrimental to the catalysts used to electrochemically convert CO<sub>2</sub>/CO into valuable fuels and chemicals. A significant suppression of C<sub>2+</sub> products is observed even in the presence of 10 ppm of these impurities due to catalyst poisoning and a selectivity change. Hence, it is necessary to have an upstream cleaning process to maintain a high selectivity toward high value C<sub>2+</sub> products and to reduce the operational costs associated with frequent catalyst regeneration or replacement. We present a comprehensive process model and technoeconomic analysis of an integrated large-scale two-step CO<sub>2</sub>/CO electroreduction plant that produces C<sub>2+</sub> products including ethylene, acetic acid, ethanol, and <i>n</i>-propanol, using blast furnace gas obtained from a steel manufacturing facility as feedstock. Detailed modeling and integration of the upstream cleaning units, CO<sub>2</sub>/CO electrolyzers, and the downstream separation of gas/liquid products are performed using Aspen Plus. Our analysis shows that the large-scale two-step CO<sub>2</sub>/CO electroreduction process is not profitable under the base case scenario and requires significant improvements in electrolyzer performance, reduction in capital costs, and favorable market conditions to improve the economics. The upstream cleaning units only contribute to ∼15% of the CAPEX and ∼8% OPEX of the entire plant, while the electrolyzers contribute to ∼63% of the total CAPEX and OPEX. A positive net present value ($54M), a payback time of 13 years, and an internal rate of return of 12.8% can be achieved when the electrolyzer capital cost is $10,000/m<sup>2</sup> (-50%) and electricity price is $20/MWh (-50%), with current densities of 750 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> (+50%) for both electrolyzers and cell voltages of 2.5 V (-17%) for CO<sub>2</sub>R and 2.0 V (-20%) for COR electrolyzers, and when the product prices are 35% higher than the current market prices. Incorporating an energy-saving coelectrolysis process or integration into facilities that can directly utilize the products can accelerate the commercialization of the two-step CO<sub>2</sub>/CO electroreduction process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c03012
Primary Topic
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process Modeling and Techno-economic Analysis of an Integrated Large-Scale CO 2 /CO Electroreduction Plant to Produce C 2+ Products

Wiebren de Jong, Isabell Bagemihl, Ruud Kortlever, Mahinder Ramdin et al.
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
article

Process Modeling and Techno-economic Analysis of an Integrated Large-Scale CO 2 /CO Electroreduction Plant to Produce C 2+ Products

Wiebren de Jong, Isabell Bagemihl, Ruud Kortlever, Mahinder Ramdin, Asvin Sajeev, Matthijs Kroes
article en

Abstract

CO<sub>2</sub> feedstock obtained from point sources, such as chemical industries or fossil fuel-based power plants, typically contains gaseous contaminants such as SO <sub><i>x</i></sub> , NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> , H<sub>2</sub>S, and COS, which can be detrimental to the catalysts used to electrochemically convert CO<sub>2</sub>/CO into valuable fuels and chemicals. A significant suppression of C<sub>2+</sub> products is observed even in the presence of 10 ppm of these impurities due to catalyst poisoning and a selectivity change. Hence, it is necessary to have an upstream cleaning process to maintain a high selectivity toward high value C<sub>2+</sub> products and to reduce the operational costs associated with frequent catalyst regeneration or replacement. We present a comprehensive process model and technoeconomic analysis of an integrated large-scale two-step CO<sub>2</sub>/CO electroreduction plant that produces C<sub>2+</sub> products including ethylene, acetic acid, ethanol, and <i>n</i>-propanol, using blast furnace gas obtained from a steel manufacturing facility as feedstock. Detailed modeling and integration of the upstream cleaning units, CO<sub>2</sub>/CO electrolyzers, and the downstream separation of gas/liquid products are performed using Aspen Plus. Our analysis shows that the large-scale two-step CO<sub>2</sub>/CO electroreduction process is not profitable under the base case scenario and requires significant improvements in electrolyzer performance, reduction in capital costs, and favorable market conditions to improve the economics. The upstream cleaning units only contribute to ∼15% of the CAPEX and ∼8% OPEX of the entire plant, while the electrolyzers contribute to ∼63% of the total CAPEX and OPEX. A positive net present value ($54M), a payback time of 13 years, and an internal rate of return of 12.8% can be achieved when the electrolyzer capital cost is $10,000/m<sup>2</sup> (-50%) and electricity price is $20/MWh (-50%), with current densities of 750 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> (+50%) for both electrolyzers and cell voltages of 2.5 V (-17%) for CO<sub>2</sub>R and 2.0 V (-20%) for COR electrolyzers, and when the product prices are 35% higher than the current market prices. Incorporating an energy-saving coelectrolysis process or integration into facilities that can directly utilize the products can accelerate the commercialization of the two-step CO<sub>2</sub>/CO electroreduction process.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchVol. 65(3)
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.