A national survey of the clinical practice of surface-guided radiation therapy in Japan

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diffusion of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT), implementation of quality control and quality assurance strategies, established clinical workflows and user perceptions regarding the benefits and limitations of SGRT in routine practice. From October to December 2024, we surveyed 880 radiotherapy institutions in Japan regarding institutional characteristics, quality assurance/quality control, computed tomography simulation, treatment procedures and general questions regarding SGRT. The survey was distributed via mailing list and through vendors, and administered via Google Forms. A total of 292 institutions responded, corresponding to a response rate of 33%. Ninety-eight institutions reported introducing SGRT, and 50 institutions had introduced it after 2022. The highest usage rate of SGRT in breast treatment was 87%. Approximately half of the institutions performed daily checks of SGRT and radiation isocenter coincidence, as well as static accuracy, whereas 6% did not perform these checks at all. The primary functions of the SGRT system were patient positioning (94%), respiratory management (78%), patient monitoring (76%) and skin marker-less techniques (69%). Many institutions reduced or eliminated skin marking, citing simplified workflows and reduced setup time. Many respondents observed that SGRT implementation reduced both setup and treatment times for breast/chest, abdomen/pelvis and extremity procedures. SGRT has been widely embraced in Japan, offering notable clinical and workflow benefits. However, because participation in this survey was voluntary, the results may overrepresent institutions with greater awareness or adoption of SGRT. Greater standardization, broader insurance coverage and ongoing technological advancements are essential to fully realize its advantages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf086
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A national survey of the clinical practice of surface-guided radiation therapy in Japan

Masahiko Kurooka, H Onishi, Tomoki Kitagawa, Ryohei Yamauchi et al.
Journal of Radiation Research
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

A national survey of the clinical practice of surface-guided radiation therapy in Japan

Masahiko Kurooka, H Onishi, Tomoki Kitagawa, Ryohei Yamauchi, Naoki Tohyama, Yoshifumi Oku, Yoshinobu Shimohigashi, Takayuki Kanai, Chie Kurokawa, Masahide Saito, Shinobu Kumagai, Yusuke Ueshima, Hironori Kojima, Hidekazu Suzuki, Naoki Hayashi, Eriko Saito, Masataka Sakamoto, Tatsunori Saito, Takeshi Ohno, Hiroki Katayama, Makoto Sasaki
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diffusion of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT), implementation of quality control and quality assurance strategies, established clinical workflows and user perceptions regarding the benefits and limitations of SGRT in routine practice. From October to December 2024, we surveyed 880 radiotherapy institutions in Japan regarding institutional characteristics, quality assurance/quality control, computed tomography simulation, treatment procedures and general questions regarding SGRT. The survey was distributed via mailing list and through vendors, and administered via Google Forms. A total of 292 institutions responded, corresponding to a response rate of 33%. Ninety-eight institutions reported introducing SGRT, and 50 institutions had introduced it after 2022. The highest usage rate of SGRT in breast treatment was 87%. Approximately half of the institutions performed daily checks of SGRT and radiation isocenter coincidence, as well as static accuracy, whereas 6% did not perform these checks at all. The primary functions of the SGRT system were patient positioning (94%), respiratory management (78%), patient monitoring (76%) and skin marker-less techniques (69%). Many institutions reduced or eliminated skin marking, citing simplified workflows and reduced setup time. Many respondents observed that SGRT implementation reduced both setup and treatment times for breast/chest, abdomen/pelvis and extremity procedures. SGRT has been widely embraced in Japan, offering notable clinical and workflow benefits. However, because participation in this survey was voluntary, the results may overrepresent institutions with greater awareness or adoption of SGRT. Greater standardization, broader insurance coverage and ongoing technological advancements are essential to fully realize its advantages.

Journal of Radiation ResearchVol. 67(1)
Tokyo Medical University (JP), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP), Juntendo University (JP), St. Luke's International Hospital (JP), Teikyo University Hospital (JP), Kanazawa University Hospital (JP), Tokyo Medical University Hospital (JP), University of Yamanashi Hospital (JP), Kagoshima University Hospital (JP), Kumamoto University Hospital (JP), Fujita Health University Hospital (JP), Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital (JP), Aichi Cancer Center (JP), Kagawa University Hospital (JP), Chiba Hospital (JP), Tokyo Women's Medical University (JP), Kyoto University Hospital (JP), Komazawa University (JP), Teikyo University (JP), Kumamoto University (JP)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.