Factors for analytical and intuitive cognition in strategy consultants: A multivariate analysis

It is often claimed that strategy consultants exert an important influence on strategy processes of organizations ascribing a pointedly analytical way of working and thus thinking. This paper examines the cognitive styles of strategy consultants, specifically the balance between analytical and intuitive thinking. We use a quantitative research design employing statistical methods such as linear models, path analysis, non-parametric analyses, and principal component analysis - methods that go beyond standard applications and allow for more comprehensive modeling of interrelated factors. Our survey data of strategy consultants provides a robust analysis of cognitive styles, biases, debiasing approaches, and relevant control variables. The results reveal that while strategy consultants generally favor analytical thinking, senior consultants increasingly rely on intuition as their experience grows. The findings also highlight the role of bias awareness and debiasing measures in decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106251
Primary Topic
Management and Marketing Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors for analytical and intuitive cognition in strategy consultants: A multivariate analysis

Michael Stadler, Matthias Templ
Acta Psychologica
Management and Marketing Education
article

Factors for analytical and intuitive cognition in strategy consultants: A multivariate analysis

Michael Stadler, Matthias Templ
article en

Abstract

It is often claimed that strategy consultants exert an important influence on strategy processes of organizations ascribing a pointedly analytical way of working and thus thinking. This paper examines the cognitive styles of strategy consultants, specifically the balance between analytical and intuitive thinking. We use a quantitative research design employing statistical methods such as linear models, path analysis, non-parametric analyses, and principal component analysis - methods that go beyond standard applications and allow for more comprehensive modeling of interrelated factors. Our survey data of strategy consultants provides a robust analysis of cognitive styles, biases, debiasing approaches, and relevant control variables. The results reveal that while strategy consultants generally favor analytical thinking, senior consultants increasingly rely on intuition as their experience grows. The findings also highlight the role of bias awareness and debiasing measures in decision-making processes.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 263
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Management and Marketing Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Factors for analytical and intuitive cognition in strategy consultants: A multivariate analysis — Michael Stadler, Matthias Templ · Acta Psychologica (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS