Making Chaos Out of COVID-19 Testing

Mathematical models for infectious diseases, particularly autonomous ODE models, are generally known to possess simple dynamics, often converging to stable disease-free or endemic equilibria. This paper investigates the dynamic consequences of a crucial, yet often overlooked, component of pandemic response: the saturation of public health testing. We extend the standard SIR model to include compartments for ‘Confirmed’ (C) and ‘Monitored’ (M) individuals, resulting in a new SICMR model. By fitting the model to U.S. COVID-19 pandemic data (specifically the Omicron wave of late 2021), we demonstrate that capacity constraints in testing destabilize the testing-free endemic equilibrium (E1). This equilibrium becomes an unstable saddle-focus. The instability is driven by a sociological feedback loop, where the rise in confirmed cases drive testing effort, modeled by a nonlinear Holling Type II functional response. We explicitly verify that the eigenvalues for the best-fit model satisfy the Shilnikov condition (λu>λs), demonstrating the system possesses the necessary ingredients for complex, chaotic-like dynamics. Furthermore, we employ Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs) to show that intrinsic noise interacts with this instability to generate ’noise-induced bursting,’ replicating the complex wave-like patterns observed in empirical data. Our results suggest that public health interventions, such as testing, are not merely passive controls but active dynamical variables that can fundamentally alter the qualitative stability of an epidemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14020306
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Chaos Out of COVID-19 Testing

Bo Deng, Cristina Januário, Chayu Yang, Jorge Duarte
Mathematics
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

Making Chaos Out of COVID-19 Testing

Bo Deng, Cristina Januário, Chayu Yang, Jorge Duarte
article en

Abstract

Mathematical models for infectious diseases, particularly autonomous ODE models, are generally known to possess simple dynamics, often converging to stable disease-free or endemic equilibria. This paper investigates the dynamic consequences of a crucial, yet often overlooked, component of pandemic response: the saturation of public health testing. We extend the standard SIR model to include compartments for ‘Confirmed’ (C) and ‘Monitored’ (M) individuals, resulting in a new SICMR model. By fitting the model to U.S. COVID-19 pandemic data (specifically the Omicron wave of late 2021), we demonstrate that capacity constraints in testing destabilize the testing-free endemic equilibrium (E1). This equilibrium becomes an unstable saddle-focus. The instability is driven by a sociological feedback loop, where the rise in confirmed cases drive testing effort, modeled by a nonlinear Holling Type II functional response. We explicitly verify that the eigenvalues for the best-fit model satisfy the Shilnikov condition (λu>λs), demonstrating the system possesses the necessary ingredients for complex, chaotic-like dynamics. Furthermore, we employ Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs) to show that intrinsic noise interacts with this instability to generate ’noise-induced bursting,’ replicating the complex wave-like patterns observed in empirical data. Our results suggest that public health interventions, such as testing, are not merely passive controls but active dynamical variables that can fundamentally alter the qualitative stability of an epidemic.

MathematicsVol. 14(2)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT), University of Aveiro (PT)
Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.