Stanford neuromodulation therapy for treatment‐resistant depression: a randomized controlled trial confirming efficacy, and an <scp>EEG</scp> study providing insight into mechanism of action and a potentially predictive biomarker of efficacy

Stanford neuromodulation therapy (SNT) is a rapid-acting, high-dose, intermittent theta-burst stimulation protocol. Although it has previously demonstrated efficacy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), replication in a larger sample is needed. Additionally, the electrophysiological effects of SNT remain unknown. Here we report results from a new double-blind, sham-controlled RCT along with electroencephalography (EEG) findings from the initial and current trials. In the current RCT, 53 participants with TRD were enrolled, and 48 who continued to meet entry criteria were randomized to receive active (N=24) or sham (N=24) SNT. At 1-month, remission (primary outcome) was achieved in 50.0% of active vs. 20.8% of sham participants (χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>1,48</sub>=4.5, p=0.035), and response (secondary outcome) similarly favored active treatment (54.2% vs. 25.0%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>1,48</sub>=4.3, p=0.039). Beta band EEG findings converged across trials: frontal beta power decreased significantly following active but not sham SNT in both the initial pilot study and the current trial. Additionally, beta baseline activity and post-SNT changes related to treatment efficacy in the current study. Specifically, greater post-SNT reduction in left anterior cingulate cortex (L-ACC) beta power correlated with greater clinical improvement immediately (rho=0.48, p=0.019) and 1-month after (rho=0.51, p=0.012) active SNT. Moreover, higher pre-treatment L-ACC beta power predicted greater subsequent clinical benefit from active SNT (immediate-post: β=-10.26, p=0.0042; 1-month after: β=-9.00, p=0.024). Neither of these L-ACC beta power findings was observed with sham stimulation. In sum, this study replicates SNT's therapeutic efficacy, identifies left frontal beta suppression as a potential mechanism of action, and highlights baseline L-ACC beta power as a candidate scalable pre-treatment biomarker of efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Psychiatry
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.70032
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
78.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stanford neuromodulation therapy for treatment‐resistant depression: a randomized controlled trial confirming efficacy, and an EEG study providing insight into mechanism of action and a potentially predictive biomarker of efficacy

Andrew Geoly, Flint M. Espil, Tiffany J. Ford, Claudia Tischler et al.
2 citations
World Psychiatry
Neurological disorders and treatments
78.30
article

Stanford neuromodulation therapy for treatment‐resistant depression: a randomized controlled trial confirming efficacy, and an EEG study providing insight into mechanism of action and a potentially predictive biomarker of efficacy

Andrew Geoly, Flint M. Espil, Tiffany J. Ford, Claudia Tischler, Angela Phillips, Malvika Sridhar, Brendan L. Wong, Eleanor Cole, Masataka Wada, David Spiegel, Irakli Kaloiani, Gregory L. Sahlem, Jarrod Ehrie, Alan F. Schatzberg, Nolan Williams, Christopher W. Austelle, Brandon S. Bentzley, Jennifer I. Lissemore, Ethan Makarewycz, Lena Kozyr, Anna Chaiken, Bora Kim, Booil Jo, Romina Nejad, Cammie Rolle, Adi Maron‐Katz, Noriah Johnson, Jean‐Marie Batail, Ian H. Kratter, Nick Bassano, Stephanie Wan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Stanford neuromodulation therapy (SNT) is a rapid-acting, high-dose, intermittent theta-burst stimulation protocol. Although it has previously demonstrated efficacy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), replication in a larger sample is needed. Additionally, the electrophysiological effects of SNT remain unknown. Here we report results from a new double-blind, sham-controlled RCT along with electroencephalography (EEG) findings from the initial and current trials. In the current RCT, 53 participants with TRD were enrolled, and 48 who continued to meet entry criteria were randomized to receive active (N=24) or sham (N=24) SNT. At 1-month, remission (primary outcome) was achieved in 50.0% of active vs. 20.8% of sham participants (χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>1,48</sub>=4.5, p=0.035), and response (secondary outcome) similarly favored active treatment (54.2% vs. 25.0%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>1,48</sub>=4.3, p=0.039). Beta band EEG findings converged across trials: frontal beta power decreased significantly following active but not sham SNT in both the initial pilot study and the current trial. Additionally, beta baseline activity and post-SNT changes related to treatment efficacy in the current study. Specifically, greater post-SNT reduction in left anterior cingulate cortex (L-ACC) beta power correlated with greater clinical improvement immediately (rho=0.48, p=0.019) and 1-month after (rho=0.51, p=0.012) active SNT. Moreover, higher pre-treatment L-ACC beta power predicted greater subsequent clinical benefit from active SNT (immediate-post: β=-10.26, p=0.0042; 1-month after: β=-9.00, p=0.024). Neither of these L-ACC beta power findings was observed with sham stimulation. In sum, this study replicates SNT's therapeutic efficacy, identifies left frontal beta suppression as a potential mechanism of action, and highlights baseline L-ACC beta power as a candidate scalable pre-treatment biomarker of efficacy.

World PsychiatryVol. 25(1)
Baylor College of Medicine (US), Neurosciences Institute (US), Keio University (JP), Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research (US), Behavioral Pharma (United States) (US), Centre Hospitalier Guillaume Régnier (FR), Department of Veterans Affairs (AU), Stanford University (US)
Mellam Family Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Neurological disorders and treatments
78.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.