Validation of health literacy competencies for healthcare professionals in Korea: a psychometric evaluation study

Although health literacy is critical for determining the quality and outcomes of healthcare, research on the health literacy competencies (HLCs) of healthcare professionals tasked with identifying and educating vulnerable populations remains limited. This study aimed to validate and refine a previously developed HLCs instrument for use among healthcare professionals in Korea. The original instrument was based on the conceptualization of HLCs, and included four domains: knowledge, attitudes, skills, and practices. Following translating and back-translating, a three-round Delphi survey was conducted with 20 health literacy experts from diverse fields between October 2022 and September 2023. The experts rated each item on a four-point Likert scale to compute the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR), and provided written feedback and recommendations, retaining 61 items for field testing. After expert panel review, a web-based survey was administered from October to December 2023 to physicians, registered nurses, pharmacists, and dietitians with ≥ 6 months of experience and routine direct patient contact. Of the 391 respondents, 359 were included in the final analysis. Validity and reliability were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, and test–retest reliability. Most participants were female (79.7%), and nurses represented 54.3% of the participants. The final instrument comprised 43 items across four domains: knowledge (11 items), attitudes (8 items), skills (12 items), and practices (12 items). CFA indicated a good model fit (χ² = 1534.94, df = 854, p < 0.001, root mean square error of approximation = 0.047, comparative fit index = 0.939, Tucker–Lewis index = 0.936, and standardized root mean residual = 0.070). The scale also showed good internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93), strong test-retest reliability (r = 0.85, p < 0.001), good intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.72–0.90), F (1, 68) = 35.62, and p < 0.001. The Korean version of the HLCs demonstrates strong validity and reliability for use among healthcare professionals in Korea. However, given the predominance of nurses in the validation sample, future research should consider including diverse groups of healthcare professionals, such as pharmacists, doctors, and allied health practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08605-0
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of health literacy competencies for healthcare professionals in Korea: a psychometric evaluation study

C. H. Park, Hae-Ra Han, Won Ju Hwang, Soo Jin Kang
BMC Medical Education
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Validation of health literacy competencies for healthcare professionals in Korea: a psychometric evaluation study

C. H. Park, Hae-Ra Han, Won Ju Hwang, Soo Jin Kang
article en

Abstract

Although health literacy is critical for determining the quality and outcomes of healthcare, research on the health literacy competencies (HLCs) of healthcare professionals tasked with identifying and educating vulnerable populations remains limited. This study aimed to validate and refine a previously developed HLCs instrument for use among healthcare professionals in Korea. The original instrument was based on the conceptualization of HLCs, and included four domains: knowledge, attitudes, skills, and practices. Following translating and back-translating, a three-round Delphi survey was conducted with 20 health literacy experts from diverse fields between October 2022 and September 2023. The experts rated each item on a four-point Likert scale to compute the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR), and provided written feedback and recommendations, retaining 61 items for field testing. After expert panel review, a web-based survey was administered from October to December 2023 to physicians, registered nurses, pharmacists, and dietitians with ≥ 6 months of experience and routine direct patient contact. Of the 391 respondents, 359 were included in the final analysis. Validity and reliability were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, and test–retest reliability. Most participants were female (79.7%), and nurses represented 54.3% of the participants. The final instrument comprised 43 items across four domains: knowledge (11 items), attitudes (8 items), skills (12 items), and practices (12 items). CFA indicated a good model fit (χ² = 1534.94, df = 854, p < 0.001, root mean square error of approximation = 0.047, comparative fit index = 0.939, Tucker–Lewis index = 0.936, and standardized root mean residual = 0.070). The scale also showed good internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93), strong test-retest reliability (r = 0.85, p < 0.001), good intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.72–0.90), F (1, 68) = 35.62, and p < 0.001. The Korean version of the HLCs demonstrates strong validity and reliability for use among healthcare professionals in Korea. However, given the predominance of nurses in the validation sample, future research should consider including diverse groups of healthcare professionals, such as pharmacists, doctors, and allied health practitioners.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Kyung Hee University (KR), Keimyung University (KR), Daegu University (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.