“Attacking” the Gut–Brain Axis with Psychobiotics: An Umbrella Review of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This umbrella review critically evaluates the available evidence on psychobiotics for depressive and anxiety symptoms, emphasizing methodological quality, consistency of findings, and persistent gaps in the literature. <b>Methods</b>: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, Cochrane, and EBSCO (May-June 2025) to identify systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials examining probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic interventions in adults with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms or diagnoses. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated methodological quality using AMSTAR-2. Additional bibliometric, conceptual, and psychometric features were mapped, including geographical origin, publication timeline, scale distribution, and citation-based connectivity. <b>Results</b>: Thirty systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. Methodological quality was predominantly moderate, low, or critically low in 76.6% of reviews. Probiotic interventions demonstrated consistent benefits for MDD (SMD = -0.50 [95% CI: -0.58 to -0.42], <i>p</i> = 0.0001). However, findings for anxiety were markedly inconsistent, despite the modest improvements in specific subgroups (SMD = -0.19 [95% CI: -0.28 to -0.10]; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Prebiotics for MDD interventions showed limited positive results (SMD = -0.25 [95% CI: -0.47 to -0.03]; <i>p</i> = 0.03). For anxiety, the effects are inconclusive (SMD = -0.07 [95% CI: -0.30 to 0.10]; <i>p</i> = 0.18). Evidence for synbiotics was scarce. Citation-mapping revealed a fragmented and unevenly connected evidence base. <b>Conclusions</b>: The current evidence suggests that probiotics may confer beneficial effects on depressive and anxiety symptoms; however, the same cannot be said for prebiotics and synbiotics. Evidence for the efficacy of prebiotics and synbiotics to treat depression and anxiety is still insufficient or heterogeneous. Registration: CRD420251164884.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19010156
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Attacking” the Gut–Brain Axis with Psychobiotics: An Umbrella Review of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms

Kátia Flávia Fernandes, James Oluwagbamigbe Fajemiroye, Stone de Sá, G. R. Pedrino et al.
Pharmaceuticals
Gut microbiota and health
article

“Attacking” the Gut–Brain Axis with Psychobiotics: An Umbrella Review of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms

Kátia Flávia Fernandes, James Oluwagbamigbe Fajemiroye, Stone de Sá, G. R. Pedrino, Iransé Oliveira-Silva, Vicente Aprigliano, José Luís Rodrigues Martins, Alberto Souza Sá Filho, Gaspar R. Chiappa, Pedro Augusto Inácio, Gunnar P. H. Dietz, Tatiane Bastos Souza
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This umbrella review critically evaluates the available evidence on psychobiotics for depressive and anxiety symptoms, emphasizing methodological quality, consistency of findings, and persistent gaps in the literature. <b>Methods</b>: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, Cochrane, and EBSCO (May-June 2025) to identify systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials examining probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic interventions in adults with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms or diagnoses. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated methodological quality using AMSTAR-2. Additional bibliometric, conceptual, and psychometric features were mapped, including geographical origin, publication timeline, scale distribution, and citation-based connectivity. <b>Results</b>: Thirty systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. Methodological quality was predominantly moderate, low, or critically low in 76.6% of reviews. Probiotic interventions demonstrated consistent benefits for MDD (SMD = -0.50 [95% CI: -0.58 to -0.42], <i>p</i> = 0.0001). However, findings for anxiety were markedly inconsistent, despite the modest improvements in specific subgroups (SMD = -0.19 [95% CI: -0.28 to -0.10]; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Prebiotics for MDD interventions showed limited positive results (SMD = -0.25 [95% CI: -0.47 to -0.03]; <i>p</i> = 0.03). For anxiety, the effects are inconclusive (SMD = -0.07 [95% CI: -0.30 to 0.10]; <i>p</i> = 0.18). Evidence for synbiotics was scarce. Citation-mapping revealed a fragmented and unevenly connected evidence base. <b>Conclusions</b>: The current evidence suggests that probiotics may confer beneficial effects on depressive and anxiety symptoms; however, the same cannot be said for prebiotics and synbiotics. Evidence for the efficacy of prebiotics and synbiotics to treat depression and anxiety is still insufficient or heterogeneous. Registration: CRD420251164884.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 19(1)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL), Universidade Evangelica de Goiás (BR), Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CL), Universidade Estadual de Goiás (BR), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Instituto Federal de Goiás (BR), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR), University of Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.