RAID-Dataset: human responses to affine image distortions and Gaussian noise

Image quality datasets are used to train and evaluate predictive models of subjective human perception. However, most existing datasets focus on distortions commonly found in digital media and not in natural conditions. Affine transformations are particularly relevant for study, as they are among the most commonly encountered by human observers in everyday life. This Data Descriptor presents a set of human responses to suprathreshold affine image transformations (rotation, translation, scaling) and Gaussian noise as convenient reference to compare with existing image quality datasets. The responses were measured using well-established psychophysics: the Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling (MLDS). The set contains responses to 864 distorted images. The experiments involved 210 observers and over 40,000 image quadruple comparisons. The dataset is validated by two facts: (a) the responses reproduce classical absolute detection thresholds of the affine and Gaussian distortions, and (b) the responses to Gaussian distortion are correlated to the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) of conventional image quality databases for that distortion. Moreover, the classical Piéron's law applies to the reaction times of the dataset, and Group-MAD adversarial stimuli reveal that MLDS perceptual scales are more accurate than the conventional MOS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Data
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-06581-0
Primary Topic
Image and Video Quality Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RAID-Dataset: human responses to affine image distortions and Gaussian noise

Emilio Sansano‐Sansano, Valero Laparra, Marina Martínez-Garcia, Raül Agut Montoliu et al.
Scientific Data
Image and Video Quality Assessment
article

RAID-Dataset: human responses to affine image distortions and Gaussian noise

Emilio Sansano‐Sansano, Valero Laparra, Marina Martínez-Garcia, Raül Agut Montoliu, Jesús Malo, Paula Daudén-Oliver, David Agost-Beltran
article en

Abstract

Image quality datasets are used to train and evaluate predictive models of subjective human perception. However, most existing datasets focus on distortions commonly found in digital media and not in natural conditions. Affine transformations are particularly relevant for study, as they are among the most commonly encountered by human observers in everyday life. This Data Descriptor presents a set of human responses to suprathreshold affine image transformations (rotation, translation, scaling) and Gaussian noise as convenient reference to compare with existing image quality datasets. The responses were measured using well-established psychophysics: the Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling (MLDS). The set contains responses to 864 distorted images. The experiments involved 210 observers and over 40,000 image quadruple comparisons. The dataset is validated by two facts: (a) the responses reproduce classical absolute detection thresholds of the affine and Gaussian distortions, and (b) the responses to Gaussian distortion are correlated to the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) of conventional image quality databases for that distortion. Moreover, the classical Piéron's law applies to the reaction times of the dataset, and Group-MAD adversarial stimuli reveal that MLDS perceptual scales are more accurate than the conventional MOS.

Scientific DataVol. 13(1)
Universitat Jaume I (ES), Universitat de València (ES), Parc Científic de la Universitat de València (ES)
Generalitat Valenciana, Universitat Jaume I, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Image and Video Quality Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.