A patent review of galectin-1 and galectin-3 inhibitors and their potential therapeutic applications (2022-present): an update

The patent landscape is dominated by β-D-galactopyranose and thiodigalactoside scaffolds, with limited innovation and unresolved issues in selectivity, drug-likeness, and efficacy, highlighted by GB0139's Phase II failure. Moreover, only a few patents provide structural evidence and strong in vitro/in vivo data, limiting confidence in their therapeutic outcome. By contrast, some diversification has emerged, including spirocyclic sugars, ruthenium-conjugates and non-carbohydrate ligands such as heterocycles and repurposed drugs. These highlight underexploited avenues with promise. Yet, robust biochemical data and structural proof of binding remain scarce. To move the field forward, future patents must diversify chemotypes, substantiate binding modes with crystallography or NMR, and demonstrate translation in relevant disease models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2026.2618060
Primary Topic
Galectins and Cancer Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A patent review of galectin-1 and galectin-3 inhibitors and their potential therapeutic applications (2022-present): an update

Mallika Alvala, Aaftaab Sethi
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents
Galectins and Cancer Biology
article

A patent review of galectin-1 and galectin-3 inhibitors and their potential therapeutic applications (2022-present): an update

Mallika Alvala, Aaftaab Sethi
article en

Abstract

The patent landscape is dominated by β-D-galactopyranose and thiodigalactoside scaffolds, with limited innovation and unresolved issues in selectivity, drug-likeness, and efficacy, highlighted by GB0139's Phase II failure. Moreover, only a few patents provide structural evidence and strong in vitro/in vivo data, limiting confidence in their therapeutic outcome. By contrast, some diversification has emerged, including spirocyclic sugars, ruthenium-conjugates and non-carbohydrate ligands such as heterocycles and repurposed drugs. These highlight underexploited avenues with promise. Yet, robust biochemical data and structural proof of binding remain scarce. To move the field forward, future patents must diversify chemotypes, substantiate binding modes with crystallography or NMR, and demonstrate translation in relevant disease models.

Expert Opinion on Therapeutic PatentsVol. 36(3)
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Galectins and Cancer Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.