Reframing Research Ethics in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Key Issues and Practical Proposals

This article explores how the traditional framework of research ethics must be redefined in response to the ethical challenges posed by the academic use of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI). As Gen AI technologies become increasingly integrated across various stages of research—from study design and data analysis to manuscript writing—they offer notable gains in efficiency, while simultaneously expanding ethical gray areas. In particular, issues such as factual inaccuracies and hallucinations, violations of privacy and copyright, ambiguous authorship, and the deskilling of researchers are becoming increasingly entangled, posing serious threats to the credibility and integrity of academic work. To address these concerns, the article proposes four core ethical principles suited to the Gen AI era: truthfulness and explainability, respect for intellectual property, field-specific guidelines, and the cultivation of researcher competence. The central concern is not merely whether such technologies should be adopted, but rather how the identity and responsibility of researchers, and the sustainability of scholarly communities, can be ethically restructured in the face of transformative technological change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.2025.28.4.279
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing Research Ethics in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Key Issues and Practical Proposals

Moon-jeong Kim, Do-kyong Kim
Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Reframing Research Ethics in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Key Issues and Practical Proposals

Moon-jeong Kim, Do-kyong Kim
article en

Abstract

This article explores how the traditional framework of research ethics must be redefined in response to the ethical challenges posed by the academic use of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI). As Gen AI technologies become increasingly integrated across various stages of research—from study design and data analysis to manuscript writing—they offer notable gains in efficiency, while simultaneously expanding ethical gray areas. In particular, issues such as factual inaccuracies and hallucinations, violations of privacy and copyright, ambiguous authorship, and the deskilling of researchers are becoming increasingly entangled, posing serious threats to the credibility and integrity of academic work. To address these concerns, the article proposes four core ethical principles suited to the Gen AI era: truthfulness and explainability, respect for intellectual property, field-specific guidelines, and the cultivation of researcher competence. The central concern is not merely whether such technologies should be adopted, but rather how the identity and responsibility of researchers, and the sustainability of scholarly communities, can be ethically restructured in the face of transformative technological change.

Korean Journal of Medical EthicsVol. 28(4)
Ministry of Education, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.