English language attitudes in Australia

Abstract This study investigates contemporary Australian attitudes toward a range of L1 and L2 English accents, building on prior research showing that standardised varieties are typically rated higher on status traits and non-standardised varieties are rated higher on solidarity. 138 Australian-born listeners rated audio stimuli from 12 male speakers representing 12 English L1 and L2 accents on seven attributes related to status, solidarity, and clarity. Results revealed a clear evaluative hierarchy: British RP was rated highest overall, General Australian was viewed positively across dimensions, while Broad Australian and L2 accents were rated more negatively. Contrary to past findings, Broad Australian did not show a solidarity advantage, suggesting sociolinguistic shifts in which General Australian now functions as both a status and solidarity norm. The persistence of negative evaluations for L2 English speakers underscores enduring accent-based biases in Australian society, with implications for equity in an increasingly multilingual context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25071.gne
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

English language attitudes in Australia

Ksenia Gnevsheva, Carmel O’Shannessy
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

English language attitudes in Australia

Ksenia Gnevsheva, Carmel O’Shannessy
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates contemporary Australian attitudes toward a range of L1 and L2 English accents, building on prior research showing that standardised varieties are typically rated higher on status traits and non-standardised varieties are rated higher on solidarity. 138 Australian-born listeners rated audio stimuli from 12 male speakers representing 12 English L1 and L2 accents on seven attributes related to status, solidarity, and clarity. Results revealed a clear evaluative hierarchy: British RP was rated highest overall, General Australian was viewed positively across dimensions, while Broad Australian and L2 accents were rated more negatively. Contrary to past findings, Broad Australian did not show a solidarity advantage, suggesting sociolinguistic shifts in which General Australian now functions as both a status and solidarity norm. The persistence of negative evaluations for L2 English speakers underscores enduring accent-based biases in Australian society, with implications for equity in an increasingly multilingual context.

Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Australian National University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.