Institutional barriers to dynamic truck charging: why electric road systems struggle in Europe

Electric road systems (ERS) have been proposed as an efficient solution to dynamically charge electric trucks but have not yet become a dominant solution. This paper provides an institutional explanation for the case of Europe, building on 22 expert interviews in eight European countries, event observations, and policy documents. The analysis identifies three main explanations. Firstly, as a line infrastructure, ERS require government commitment for build-up and coordination, particularly across borders. This conflicts with the widespread idea of technology-open governments that provide R&D funds to initiate market-driven solutions. Secondly, time constraints favour readily available solutions backed by industry, like stationary charging, over sector-specific ERS technologies that lack a unified lobby with policy access. Thirdly, ERS technologies challenge long-standing sectoral designs. If policymakers want to maintain the option of ERS alongside stationary charging, they need to acknowledge this institutional uphill battle and consider compatibility requirements for vehicles and an active commitment for larger routes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.105154
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional barriers to dynamic truck charging: why electric road systems struggle in Europe

Aline Scherrer, Karoline S. Rogge, Uta Burghard, Matthew Lockwood
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Institutional barriers to dynamic truck charging: why electric road systems struggle in Europe

Aline Scherrer, Karoline S. Rogge, Uta Burghard, Matthew Lockwood
article en

Abstract

Electric road systems (ERS) have been proposed as an efficient solution to dynamically charge electric trucks but have not yet become a dominant solution. This paper provides an institutional explanation for the case of Europe, building on 22 expert interviews in eight European countries, event observations, and policy documents. The analysis identifies three main explanations. Firstly, as a line infrastructure, ERS require government commitment for build-up and coordination, particularly across borders. This conflicts with the widespread idea of technology-open governments that provide R&D funds to initiate market-driven solutions. Secondly, time constraints favour readily available solutions backed by industry, like stationary charging, over sector-specific ERS technologies that lack a unified lobby with policy access. Thirdly, ERS technologies challenge long-standing sectoral designs. If policymakers want to maintain the option of ERS alongside stationary charging, they need to acknowledge this institutional uphill battle and consider compatibility requirements for vehicles and an active commitment for larger routes.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 153
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutional barriers to dynamic truck charging: why electric road systems struggle in Europe — Aline Scherrer, Karoline S. Rogge, et al. · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS