Comparative Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Bioavailability Assessment of Levothyroxine Sodium in Different Dosage Forms

Levothyroxine sodium is recognized as a narrow-therapeutic-index drug, making its clinical performance highly sensitive to formulation variables that can influence systemic bioavailability. This study focused on the development, physicochemical evaluation, and comparative bioavailability assessment of levothyroxine sodium formulated into three distinct dosage forms: tablets, HPMC based capsules, and soft gelatin capsules. Each formulation was manufactured using optimized processing strategies to ensure stability and dose accuracy. Physical evaluation and comprehensive in vitro testing, including assay, content uniformity, dissolution profiling, and analysis of related substances, were conducted in accordance with compendial standards. All three dosage forms exhibited satisfactory predefined quality criteria, indicating acceptable pharmaceutical performance. In vivo characterization was carried out in healthy volunteers using a randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period crossover design to compare the test products with the reference capsule. Blood samples were collected over an extended sampling period, and levothyroxine plasma concentrations were quantified using a validated analytical method. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞, were derived through non-compartmental analysis and evaluated for bioequivalence using standard statistical approaches. The in vivo results demonstrated that the soft gelatin capsules exhibited bioavailability parameters closely aligned with those of the reference product, with 90% confidence intervals for both rate and extent of absorption falling within accepted regulatory bioequivalence limits. Conversely, the directly compressed tablets and HPMC-based capsule formulations displayed higher inter-subject variability and did not consistently meet equivalence criteria across all pharmacokinetic endpoints. Among the dosage forms investigated, soft gelatin capsule provided the most reliable pharmaceutical quality and bioavailability performance relative to the reference product. These findings highlight the critical role of formulation design in achieving consistent levothyroxine exposure and support the liquid-filled soft gelatin system as a promising alternative for clinical application. Keywords: Levothyroxine sodium; Different dosage forms; Soft-gelatin capsules; Bioavailability; Bioequivalence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v16i1.7517
Primary Topic
Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Bioavailability Assessment of Levothyroxine Sodium in Different Dosage Forms

Nishanth Kumar Nagamalli, Chinna Reddy Palem, Praveen Rao Balguri, Sridhar Gumudevelli et al.
Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics
Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
article

Comparative Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Bioavailability Assessment of Levothyroxine Sodium in Different Dosage Forms

Nishanth Kumar Nagamalli, Chinna Reddy Palem, Praveen Rao Balguri, Sridhar Gumudevelli, Prashant Noolu, Varun Chilukoti, Dasarath Gurram
article en

Abstract

Levothyroxine sodium is recognized as a narrow-therapeutic-index drug, making its clinical performance highly sensitive to formulation variables that can influence systemic bioavailability. This study focused on the development, physicochemical evaluation, and comparative bioavailability assessment of levothyroxine sodium formulated into three distinct dosage forms: tablets, HPMC based capsules, and soft gelatin capsules. Each formulation was manufactured using optimized processing strategies to ensure stability and dose accuracy. Physical evaluation and comprehensive in vitro testing, including assay, content uniformity, dissolution profiling, and analysis of related substances, were conducted in accordance with compendial standards. All three dosage forms exhibited satisfactory predefined quality criteria, indicating acceptable pharmaceutical performance. In vivo characterization was carried out in healthy volunteers using a randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period crossover design to compare the test products with the reference capsule. Blood samples were collected over an extended sampling period, and levothyroxine plasma concentrations were quantified using a validated analytical method. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞, were derived through non-compartmental analysis and evaluated for bioequivalence using standard statistical approaches. The in vivo results demonstrated that the soft gelatin capsules exhibited bioavailability parameters closely aligned with those of the reference product, with 90% confidence intervals for both rate and extent of absorption falling within accepted regulatory bioequivalence limits. Conversely, the directly compressed tablets and HPMC-based capsule formulations displayed higher inter-subject variability and did not consistently meet equivalence criteria across all pharmacokinetic endpoints. Among the dosage forms investigated, soft gelatin capsule provided the most reliable pharmaceutical quality and bioavailability performance relative to the reference product. These findings highlight the critical role of formulation design in achieving consistent levothyroxine exposure and support the liquid-filled soft gelatin system as a promising alternative for clinical application. Keywords: Levothyroxine sodium; Different dosage forms; Soft-gelatin capsules; Bioavailability; Bioequivalence.

Journal of Drug Delivery and TherapeuticsVol. 16(1)
Laurus labs (India) (IN), Ascent Technology (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.