Aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. A focused review

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) has traditionally been managed with watchful waiting because of low annual sudden death rates (<1%) and concerns regarding procedural risk. Emerging randomized data indicate that irreversible myocardial injury may occur before symptom onset and that early aortic valve replacement (AVR) may improve outcomes. This review summarizes evidence from contemporary randomized controlled trials evaluating early surgical AVR (SAVR) or transcatheter AVR (TAVR) vs conservative management or surveillance in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The RECOVERY trial randomized 145 asymptomatic patients with very severe AS (mean age 64 years) to early SAVR or conservative care. Over a median follow-up of 6.2 years, all-cause mortality occurred in 1% of the early surgery group vs 15% with conservative management (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09; 95% CI 0.01-0.67; p=0.003). The AVATAR trial included 157 asymptomatic patients with severe AS, preserved LVEF, and negative exercise testing (mean age approximately 67 years). Over a median follow-up of 32 months, the composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization occurred in 16.6% of patients assigned to early surgery compared with 32.9% in the conservative group (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23-0.90; p=0.02). The EARLY TAVR trial randomized 901 asymptomatic patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF to TAVR or clinical surveillance (mean age 75.8 years). After a median follow-up of 3.8 years, the primary composite outcome of death, stroke, or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization occurred in 26.8% of the TAVR group versus 45.3% of the surveillance group (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.40-0.63; p<0.001). Cardiovascular hospitalizations occurred in 20.9% vs 41.7%, all-cause mortality in 8.4% vs 9.2%, and stroke in 4.2% vs 6.7%, with no excess procedural complications in the early TAVR group. Randomized evidence demonstrates that early AVR, including both SAVR and TAVR, reduces mortality and major cardiovascular events in carefully selected asymptomatic patients with severe AS. The integration of clinical features with risk stratification tools, such as global longitudinal strain, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, natriuretic peptides, and computed tomography-based valve calcification, supports timely intervention before irreversible myocardial damage occurs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Cardiology
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/cardio.2025.93
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. A focused review

Aimen Shafiq, Mitja J. Lainscak, Sanjeev Trehan, Rohan Dev Trehan
Global Cardiology
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. A focused review

Aimen Shafiq, Mitja J. Lainscak, Sanjeev Trehan, Rohan Dev Trehan
article en

Abstract

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) has traditionally been managed with watchful waiting because of low annual sudden death rates (<1%) and concerns regarding procedural risk. Emerging randomized data indicate that irreversible myocardial injury may occur before symptom onset and that early aortic valve replacement (AVR) may improve outcomes. This review summarizes evidence from contemporary randomized controlled trials evaluating early surgical AVR (SAVR) or transcatheter AVR (TAVR) vs conservative management or surveillance in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The RECOVERY trial randomized 145 asymptomatic patients with very severe AS (mean age 64 years) to early SAVR or conservative care. Over a median follow-up of 6.2 years, all-cause mortality occurred in 1% of the early surgery group vs 15% with conservative management (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09; 95% CI 0.01-0.67; p=0.003). The AVATAR trial included 157 asymptomatic patients with severe AS, preserved LVEF, and negative exercise testing (mean age approximately 67 years). Over a median follow-up of 32 months, the composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization occurred in 16.6% of patients assigned to early surgery compared with 32.9% in the conservative group (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23-0.90; p=0.02). The EARLY TAVR trial randomized 901 asymptomatic patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF to TAVR or clinical surveillance (mean age 75.8 years). After a median follow-up of 3.8 years, the primary composite outcome of death, stroke, or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization occurred in 26.8% of the TAVR group versus 45.3% of the surveillance group (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.40-0.63; p<0.001). Cardiovascular hospitalizations occurred in 20.9% vs 41.7%, all-cause mortality in 8.4% vs 9.2%, and stroke in 4.2% vs 6.7%, with no excess procedural complications in the early TAVR group. Randomized evidence demonstrates that early AVR, including both SAVR and TAVR, reduces mortality and major cardiovascular events in carefully selected asymptomatic patients with severe AS. The integration of clinical features with risk stratification tools, such as global longitudinal strain, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, natriuretic peptides, and computed tomography-based valve calcification, supports timely intervention before irreversible myocardial damage occurs.

Global CardiologyVol. 3(4)
Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), Pomurski muzej Murska Sobota (SI), Baylor Scott & White Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.