Outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL): Tubeless versus totally tubeless: a randomized clinical trial

Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an effective treatment for large and complicated renal stones, performed in different techniques including placement of an external nephrostomy tube, placement of an internal ureteral stent, and no external or internal tube. We aimed to compare the safety and feasibility of totally tubeless (without ureteral stenting or nephrostomy) with tubeless (with ureteral stenting), in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL). Materials and methods: This randomized clinical trial was performed on 83 patients who underwent csPCNL by a single urologist between September 2022 and June 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, tubeless csPCNL (n = 40), and group B, totally tubeless csPCNL (n = 43). Demographical data and intraoperative and postoperative parameters were recorded for all patients and compared between groups. Results: No significant differences were observed among the groups in preoperative and perioperative variables ( P > 0.05). Thirty-six (90.0%) patients in group A and 40 (93.0%) in group B were stone-free, which was not statistically significant ( P = 0.706). The mean operative time between groups A and B (43.50 ± 24.21 and 43.56 ± 23.64, respectively) was not considered significant ( P = 0.991). There was also no significant difference between groups with regard to serum creatinine change, hemoglobin drop, analgesic requirement, hospital stay, and time of return to normal life ( P > 0.05). The postoperative complication rate was higher in group A than in the other group with no statistically significant difference ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both tubeless and totally tubeless csPCNL are technically feasible with comparable outcomes. Concerning the high stone-free and low complications rate associated with the totally tubeless approach, it can be considered as a safe and cost-effective alternative to tubeless csPCNL in selected patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urological Science
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/us9.0000000000000083
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL): Tubeless versus totally tubeless: a randomized clinical trial

Reza Falahatkar, Siavash Falahatkar, Shahab Aali, Samaneh Esmaeili et al.
Urological Science
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL): Tubeless versus totally tubeless: a randomized clinical trial

Reza Falahatkar, Siavash Falahatkar, Shahab Aali, Samaneh Esmaeili, Ehsan Kazemnezhad
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an effective treatment for large and complicated renal stones, performed in different techniques including placement of an external nephrostomy tube, placement of an internal ureteral stent, and no external or internal tube. We aimed to compare the safety and feasibility of totally tubeless (without ureteral stenting or nephrostomy) with tubeless (with ureteral stenting), in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL). Materials and methods: This randomized clinical trial was performed on 83 patients who underwent csPCNL by a single urologist between September 2022 and June 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, tubeless csPCNL (n = 40), and group B, totally tubeless csPCNL (n = 43). Demographical data and intraoperative and postoperative parameters were recorded for all patients and compared between groups. Results: No significant differences were observed among the groups in preoperative and perioperative variables ( P > 0.05). Thirty-six (90.0%) patients in group A and 40 (93.0%) in group B were stone-free, which was not statistically significant ( P = 0.706). The mean operative time between groups A and B (43.50 ± 24.21 and 43.56 ± 23.64, respectively) was not considered significant ( P = 0.991). There was also no significant difference between groups with regard to serum creatinine change, hemoglobin drop, analgesic requirement, hospital stay, and time of return to normal life ( P > 0.05). The postoperative complication rate was higher in group A than in the other group with no statistically significant difference ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both tubeless and totally tubeless csPCNL are technically feasible with comparable outcomes. Concerning the high stone-free and low complications rate associated with the totally tubeless approach, it can be considered as a safe and cost-effective alternative to tubeless csPCNL in selected patients.

Urological Science
Guilan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.