Evaluating network features for risk assessment in fish and seafood safety notification systems: A machine learning investigation

This study investigates whether network centrality metrics enhance machine learning-based risk classification in international food safety notification systems. We constructed a directed, weighted country network from 1,364 notifications spanning 96 countries (2020–2025) and computed 11 centrality measures, including PageRank, betweenness, and eigenvector centrality. Although centrality features are strongly associated with risk categories (Kruskal-Wallis p<10−16, η2=0.067), they provide negligible predictive contribution (ablation ΔF1=−0.005). This mismatch is explained by redundancy analysis: categorical country encodings correlate highly with network position (ρ=0.87 for Spain’s out-strength), rendering explicit centrality metrics largely superfluous for tree-based classifiers. The network shows scale-free tendencies, moderate community structure (modularity Q=0.293), and negative assortativity (r=−0.26). Gradient Boosting achieved F1-macro =0.459 (0.492 with SMOTE), Cohen’s κ=0.538, and ROC-AUC =0.852; year dominated feature importance (0.079), indicating regulatory evolution rather than topology as the primary signal. Temporal validation produced a 16.6 % F1 degradation, with a disproportionate minority-class decline (−31%). Hierarchical classification improved minority detection (no-risk recall: 0 % → 25 %). Community-stratified evaluation uncovered fairness disparities (F1 range =0.26) not explained by sample size (ρ=0.31, p=.61). Overall, statistical significance does not imply predictive importance for network features in food safety classification. Network analysis remains valuable for interpretability and identifying structurally significant nodes, while comparable predictive performance can be achieved using simpler categorical encodings. Severe class imbalance (77:1) and concept drift motivate hierarchical modeling, quarterly retraining, and human oversight for minority classes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109106
Primary Topic
Identification and Quantification in Food
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating network features for risk assessment in fish and seafood safety notification systems: A machine learning investigation

A. Parthiban, C Shinyclimensa
Results in Engineering
Identification and Quantification in Food
article

Evaluating network features for risk assessment in fish and seafood safety notification systems: A machine learning investigation

A. Parthiban, C Shinyclimensa
article en

Abstract

This study investigates whether network centrality metrics enhance machine learning-based risk classification in international food safety notification systems. We constructed a directed, weighted country network from 1,364 notifications spanning 96 countries (2020–2025) and computed 11 centrality measures, including PageRank, betweenness, and eigenvector centrality. Although centrality features are strongly associated with risk categories (Kruskal-Wallis p<10−16, η2=0.067), they provide negligible predictive contribution (ablation ΔF1=−0.005). This mismatch is explained by redundancy analysis: categorical country encodings correlate highly with network position (ρ=0.87 for Spain’s out-strength), rendering explicit centrality metrics largely superfluous for tree-based classifiers. The network shows scale-free tendencies, moderate community structure (modularity Q=0.293), and negative assortativity (r=−0.26). Gradient Boosting achieved F1-macro =0.459 (0.492 with SMOTE), Cohen’s κ=0.538, and ROC-AUC =0.852; year dominated feature importance (0.079), indicating regulatory evolution rather than topology as the primary signal. Temporal validation produced a 16.6 % F1 degradation, with a disproportionate minority-class decline (−31%). Hierarchical classification improved minority detection (no-risk recall: 0 % → 25 %). Community-stratified evaluation uncovered fairness disparities (F1 range =0.26) not explained by sample size (ρ=0.31, p=.61). Overall, statistical significance does not imply predictive importance for network features in food safety classification. Network analysis remains valuable for interpretability and identifying structurally significant nodes, while comparable predictive performance can be achieved using simpler categorical encodings. Severe class imbalance (77:1) and concept drift motivate hierarchical modeling, quarterly retraining, and human oversight for minority classes.

Results in EngineeringVol. 29
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Identification and Quantification in Food
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.