D4.2 Literature Gap Analysis Review

INTEGRATE-LMedC Deliverable D4.2 (part of WP4) provides a strategic gap analysis of how European and national research infrastructures currently support large medical cohorts (LMedCs) across their full lifecycle—from design and implementation to long-term operation and data reuse. Rather than presenting only an inventory of services, it aims to diagnose systemic weaknesses in the European cohort-support ecosystem and use that evidence to inform a more coherent, efficient, and sustainable infrastructure landscape in Europe. Using a mixed-methods approach (mapping of service providers, interviews with service users, a scoping literature review, and a multi-stakeholder validation workshop), the analysis organises needs and gaps into five service clusters: data services; regulatory/ethical support; methodology/design; biobanking and omics; and operational coordination. Across these clusters, stakeholders prioritise persistent, cross-cutting issues such as data standardisation and interoperability, metadata quality and discoverability, data quality/completeness, inconsistent ELSI/GDPR implementation across jurisdictions, and weaknesses in recruitment/retention, biobanking/omics QA/QC, workforce capacity, and protocol registration/feasibility practices. The document’s central message is that Europe already has many capable infrastructures, but service provision remains fragmented, difficult to navigate, and insufficiently coordinated at scale. Its recommendations therefore emphasise harmonisation and integration—sustainable funding, regulatory alignment, improved standards and metadata, stronger methodological transparency, expanded federated/privacy-preserving analysis capacity, improved omics quality and representativeness, and better operational support—arguing that most gaps can be bridged by coordinating existing providers into a clearer, user-friendly, end-to-end service package rather than building entirely new infrastructures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18255307
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

D4.2 Literature Gap Analysis Review

Sara Raza Khan, Jacques Demotes‐Mainard, Maria Panagiotopoulou
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

D4.2 Literature Gap Analysis Review

Sara Raza Khan, Jacques Demotes‐Mainard, Maria Panagiotopoulou
article en

Abstract

INTEGRATE-LMedC Deliverable D4.2 (part of WP4) provides a strategic gap analysis of how European and national research infrastructures currently support large medical cohorts (LMedCs) across their full lifecycle—from design and implementation to long-term operation and data reuse. Rather than presenting only an inventory of services, it aims to diagnose systemic weaknesses in the European cohort-support ecosystem and use that evidence to inform a more coherent, efficient, and sustainable infrastructure landscape in Europe. Using a mixed-methods approach (mapping of service providers, interviews with service users, a scoping literature review, and a multi-stakeholder validation workshop), the analysis organises needs and gaps into five service clusters: data services; regulatory/ethical support; methodology/design; biobanking and omics; and operational coordination. Across these clusters, stakeholders prioritise persistent, cross-cutting issues such as data standardisation and interoperability, metadata quality and discoverability, data quality/completeness, inconsistent ELSI/GDPR implementation across jurisdictions, and weaknesses in recruitment/retention, biobanking/omics QA/QC, workforce capacity, and protocol registration/feasibility practices. The document’s central message is that Europe already has many capable infrastructures, but service provision remains fragmented, difficult to navigate, and insufficiently coordinated at scale. Its recommendations therefore emphasise harmonisation and integration—sustainable funding, regulatory alignment, improved standards and metadata, stronger methodological transparency, expanded federated/privacy-preserving analysis capacity, improved omics quality and representativeness, and better operational support—arguing that most gaps can be bridged by coordinating existing providers into a clearer, user-friendly, end-to-end service package rather than building entirely new infrastructures.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (FR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

D4.2 Literature Gap Analysis Review — Sara Raza Khan, Jacques Demotes‐Mainard, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS