Evaluating the Role of Retrieval Bags in Mitigating Contamination During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

<b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the extent of intraoperative bacterial and tumour cell spillage during minimally invasive colorectal surgery and to assess the protective value of systematic specimen retrieval using a tear-proof extraction bag. <b>Methods:</b> This multicentre, prospective observational study included patients undergoing conventional or single-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery for adenocarcinoma, premalignant polyps, or chronic diverticulitis. Three intraoperative samples were obtained for microbiological and cytological analysis: after pneumoperitoneum induction (sample 1), after vascular ligation and bowel division (sample 2), and after specimen extraction using a retrieval bag (sample 3). <b>Results:</b> Eighty-eight patients were included. Bacterial contamination increased significantly throughout the procedure occurring in 11.4% of sample 1, 37.5% of sample 2, and 67% of sample 3 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). When sample 1 was positive, sample 2 was positive in 100% of cases; when sample 2 was positive, sample 3 was positive in 79% of cases. In 33 patients (37.5%), bacterial growth was detected exclusively in sample 3. Contamination in sample 2 was significantly associated with surgical approach (<i>p</i> = 0.013), anastomotic technique (<i>p</i> = 0.022), and malignant disease (<i>p</i> = 0.038). A longer hospital stay was significantly associated with contamination in samples 1 and 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.014 and <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). No tumour cells were detected in any sample, except for one case showing atypical cells without clinical relevance in sample 3. <b>Conclusions:</b> Intraoperative bacterial contamination progressively increases during minimally invasive colorectal surgery, peaking after specimen extraction. Most clinical and surgical variables did not significantly influence contamination rates. The use of a specimen retrieval bag demonstrated a potential protective effect by containing bacterial spillage. However, no protective effect regarding tumour cell dissemination could be demonstrated based on cytology analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020726
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Role of Retrieval Bags in Mitigating Contamination During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

Jan Schirnhofer, Eberhard Brunner, Christian Obrist, Katharina Pimpl et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Evaluating the Role of Retrieval Bags in Mitigating Contamination During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

Jan Schirnhofer, Eberhard Brunner, Christian Obrist, Katharina Pimpl, Helmut Weiß, Javier Valdés-Hernández, Juan Carlos Gómez-Rosado, Andrea Balla, Salvador Morales-Conde
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the extent of intraoperative bacterial and tumour cell spillage during minimally invasive colorectal surgery and to assess the protective value of systematic specimen retrieval using a tear-proof extraction bag. <b>Methods:</b> This multicentre, prospective observational study included patients undergoing conventional or single-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery for adenocarcinoma, premalignant polyps, or chronic diverticulitis. Three intraoperative samples were obtained for microbiological and cytological analysis: after pneumoperitoneum induction (sample 1), after vascular ligation and bowel division (sample 2), and after specimen extraction using a retrieval bag (sample 3). <b>Results:</b> Eighty-eight patients were included. Bacterial contamination increased significantly throughout the procedure occurring in 11.4% of sample 1, 37.5% of sample 2, and 67% of sample 3 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). When sample 1 was positive, sample 2 was positive in 100% of cases; when sample 2 was positive, sample 3 was positive in 79% of cases. In 33 patients (37.5%), bacterial growth was detected exclusively in sample 3. Contamination in sample 2 was significantly associated with surgical approach (<i>p</i> = 0.013), anastomotic technique (<i>p</i> = 0.022), and malignant disease (<i>p</i> = 0.038). A longer hospital stay was significantly associated with contamination in samples 1 and 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.014 and <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). No tumour cells were detected in any sample, except for one case showing atypical cells without clinical relevance in sample 3. <b>Conclusions:</b> Intraoperative bacterial contamination progressively increases during minimally invasive colorectal surgery, peaking after specimen extraction. Most clinical and surgical variables did not significantly influence contamination rates. The use of a specimen retrieval bag demonstrated a potential protective effect by containing bacterial spillage. However, no protective effect regarding tumour cell dissemination could be demonstrated based on cytology analysis.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
Paracelsus Medical University (AT), Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES), Hospital Quirónsalud Sagrado Corazón (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.