Performance Analysis of Phase Change Material Walls and Different Window-to-Wall Ratios in Elderly Care Home Buildings Under Hot-Summer and Cold-Winter Climate

In regions with hot summers and cold winters, elderly care buildings face the dual challenges of high energy consumption and stringent thermal comfort requirements. Using Nanchang as a case study, this research presents an optimization approach that integrates phase change material (PCM) walls with the window-to-wall ratio (WWR). PCM wall performance was tested experimentally, and EnergyPlus simulations were conducted to assess building energy use for WWR values ranging from 0.25 to 0.50, with and without PCM. The phase change material (PCM) used in this study is paraffin (an organic phase change material), which has a melting point of 26 °C and can store and release heat during temperature fluctuations. The experimental results show that PCM walls effectively reduce heat transfer, lowering the surface temperatures of external, central, and internal walls by 3.9 °C, 3.8 °C, and 3.7 °C, respectively, compared to walls without PCM. The simulation results predict that the PCM wall can reduce air conditioning energy consumption by 8.2% in summer and total annual energy consumption by 14.2%. The impact of WWR is orientation-dependent: east and west façades experience significant cooling penalties as WWR increases and should be maintained at or below 0.30; the south façade achieves optimal performance at a WWR of 0.40, with the lowest total energy load (111.2 kW·h·m-2); and the north façade performs best at the lower bound (WWR = 0.25). Under the combined strategy (south wall with PCM and WWR = 0.40), annual total energy consumption is reduced by 9.8% compared to the baseline (no PCM), with indoor temperatures maintained between 18 and 26 °C. This range is selected based on international thermal comfort standards (e.g., ASHRAE) and comfort research specifically targeting the elderly population, ensuring comfort for elderly occupants. These findings offer valuable guidance for energy-efficient design in similar climates and demonstrate that the synergy between PCM and WWR can reduce energy consumption while maintaining thermal comfort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020367
Primary Topic
Phase Change Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Analysis of Phase Change Material Walls and Different Window-to-Wall Ratios in Elderly Care Home Buildings Under Hot-Summer and Cold-Winter Climate

Lu Nie, Wuying Chen, Bao Xie
Buildings
Phase Change Materials Research
article

Performance Analysis of Phase Change Material Walls and Different Window-to-Wall Ratios in Elderly Care Home Buildings Under Hot-Summer and Cold-Winter Climate

Lu Nie, Wuying Chen, Bao Xie
article en

Abstract

In regions with hot summers and cold winters, elderly care buildings face the dual challenges of high energy consumption and stringent thermal comfort requirements. Using Nanchang as a case study, this research presents an optimization approach that integrates phase change material (PCM) walls with the window-to-wall ratio (WWR). PCM wall performance was tested experimentally, and EnergyPlus simulations were conducted to assess building energy use for WWR values ranging from 0.25 to 0.50, with and without PCM. The phase change material (PCM) used in this study is paraffin (an organic phase change material), which has a melting point of 26 °C and can store and release heat during temperature fluctuations. The experimental results show that PCM walls effectively reduce heat transfer, lowering the surface temperatures of external, central, and internal walls by 3.9 °C, 3.8 °C, and 3.7 °C, respectively, compared to walls without PCM. The simulation results predict that the PCM wall can reduce air conditioning energy consumption by 8.2% in summer and total annual energy consumption by 14.2%. The impact of WWR is orientation-dependent: east and west façades experience significant cooling penalties as WWR increases and should be maintained at or below 0.30; the south façade achieves optimal performance at a WWR of 0.40, with the lowest total energy load (111.2 kW·h·m-2); and the north façade performs best at the lower bound (WWR = 0.25). Under the combined strategy (south wall with PCM and WWR = 0.40), annual total energy consumption is reduced by 9.8% compared to the baseline (no PCM), with indoor temperatures maintained between 18 and 26 °C. This range is selected based on international thermal comfort standards (e.g., ASHRAE) and comfort research specifically targeting the elderly population, ensuring comfort for elderly occupants. These findings offer valuable guidance for energy-efficient design in similar climates and demonstrate that the synergy between PCM and WWR can reduce energy consumption while maintaining thermal comfort.

BuildingsVol. 16(2)
Nanchang University (CN), Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Phase Change Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.