Reservoir heterogeneity between intra-platform and platform-margin settings in an isolated carbonate platform: a case study from the carboniferous, Pre-Caspian Basin

Introduction The Carboniferous isolated platform carbonate reservoirs in the Pre-Caspian Q6 Basin exhibit pronounced heterogeneity, which significantly constrains the effective prioritization and optimization of exploration targets. This study aims to elucidate the differential characteristics and genetic mechanisms of intra-platform and platform-margin reservoirs within the Carboniferous Unit 1 isolated carbonate platform in the southern Pre-Caspian Basin. Methods By integrating core and thin-section observations with porosity, permeability, mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) data, and production performance analysis, we systematically compared the reservoir properties of the two settings. Results The results indicate that reservoir differentiation is primarily controlled by differential karstification within a unified depositional framework. Although both intra-platform and platform-margin settings exhibit comparable lithologies (mainly grainstones and packstones), their pore structures differ significantly. Intra-platform reservoirs are dominated by matrix porosity (e.g., selective dissolution pores) and show favorable porosity-permeability relationships. In contrast, platform-margin reservoirs develop heterogeneous fracture-vug systems, resulting in poor porosity-permeability correlations, while conventional core analysis systematically underestimates their actual flow capacity. Distinct karstification processes govern this spatial heterogeneity: facies-controlled penecontemporaneous dissolution shapes matrix porosity in intra-platform areas, whereas superimposed multi-phase coastal karstification creates complex fracture-vug networks along the platform margin. A differential pore evolution model is established to illustrate these mechanisms. Discussion and Conclusion These findings highlight the critical role of differential karstification in the diagenetic pathways of carbonate reservoirs. They not only elucidate the genetic mechanisms behind reservoir quality differences but also offer practical implications for reservoir evaluation and provide a robust theoretical foundation for predicting high-quality carbonate reservoirs in the study area and analogous geological settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1744762
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reservoir heterogeneity between intra-platform and platform-margin settings in an isolated carbonate platform: a case study from the carboniferous, Pre-Caspian Basin

Tianyu Zheng, Xing Zeng, Shuqin Wang, Jue Hou et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Earth Science
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
18.34
article

Reservoir heterogeneity between intra-platform and platform-margin settings in an isolated carbonate platform: a case study from the carboniferous, Pre-Caspian Basin

Tianyu Zheng, Xing Zeng, Shuqin Wang, Jue Hou, Yefei Chen, Lun Zhao, Jiajun Wen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction The Carboniferous isolated platform carbonate reservoirs in the Pre-Caspian Q6 Basin exhibit pronounced heterogeneity, which significantly constrains the effective prioritization and optimization of exploration targets. This study aims to elucidate the differential characteristics and genetic mechanisms of intra-platform and platform-margin reservoirs within the Carboniferous Unit 1 isolated carbonate platform in the southern Pre-Caspian Basin. Methods By integrating core and thin-section observations with porosity, permeability, mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) data, and production performance analysis, we systematically compared the reservoir properties of the two settings. Results The results indicate that reservoir differentiation is primarily controlled by differential karstification within a unified depositional framework. Although both intra-platform and platform-margin settings exhibit comparable lithologies (mainly grainstones and packstones), their pore structures differ significantly. Intra-platform reservoirs are dominated by matrix porosity (e.g., selective dissolution pores) and show favorable porosity-permeability relationships. In contrast, platform-margin reservoirs develop heterogeneous fracture-vug systems, resulting in poor porosity-permeability correlations, while conventional core analysis systematically underestimates their actual flow capacity. Distinct karstification processes govern this spatial heterogeneity: facies-controlled penecontemporaneous dissolution shapes matrix porosity in intra-platform areas, whereas superimposed multi-phase coastal karstification creates complex fracture-vug networks along the platform margin. A differential pore evolution model is established to illustrate these mechanisms. Discussion and Conclusion These findings highlight the critical role of differential karstification in the diagenetic pathways of carbonate reservoirs. They not only elucidate the genetic mechanisms behind reservoir quality differences but also offer practical implications for reservoir evaluation and provide a robust theoretical foundation for predicting high-quality carbonate reservoirs in the study area and analogous geological settings.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 13
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
National Science and Technology Major Project
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
18.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.