Review of Imaging Modalities in Neuromuscular Disorders

Over the past four decades, numerous advances in imaging modalities have improved the diagnosis and treatment of neuromuscular diseases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US), the most common imaging modalities in neuromuscular medicine, each have benefits and limitations. MRI has a large field of view, is better at identifying deeper structures, and can incorporate contrast and different imaging sequences. However, it involves higher costs and requires patients to lie flat for prolonged periods of time. Conversely, US is faster, well-tolerated, and cost-effective with high spatial resolution, but identifying deeper structures is limited. Consequently, MRI is more useful for imaging nerve roots and inherited myopathies, whereas US has advantages in peripheral neuropathies. This review focuses on imaging of nerves and muscles in common neuromuscular conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seminars in Neurology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2769-6657
Primary Topic
Hereditary Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of Imaging Modalities in Neuromuscular Disorders

Michael S. Cartwright, David C. Preston, Staci P. Hunter
Seminars in Neurology
Hereditary Neurological Disorders
article

Review of Imaging Modalities in Neuromuscular Disorders

Michael S. Cartwright, David C. Preston, Staci P. Hunter
article en

Abstract

Over the past four decades, numerous advances in imaging modalities have improved the diagnosis and treatment of neuromuscular diseases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US), the most common imaging modalities in neuromuscular medicine, each have benefits and limitations. MRI has a large field of view, is better at identifying deeper structures, and can incorporate contrast and different imaging sequences. However, it involves higher costs and requires patients to lie flat for prolonged periods of time. Conversely, US is faster, well-tolerated, and cost-effective with high spatial resolution, but identifying deeper structures is limited. Consequently, MRI is more useful for imaging nerve roots and inherited myopathies, whereas US has advantages in peripheral neuropathies. This review focuses on imaging of nerves and muscles in common neuromuscular conditions.

Seminars in NeurologyVol. 45(06)
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Hereditary Neurological Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Review of Imaging Modalities in Neuromuscular Disorders — Michael S. Cartwright, David C. Preston, et al. · Seminars in Neurology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS