Evaluating the thermal response of large-scale decking assemblies exposed to firebrand piles

Firebrand accumulation in the form of piles significantly contribute to structural losses in the Wildland-Urban Interface. Decking materials may be particularly vulnerable to ignition from firebrand piles. However, large-scale studies replicating real-world conditions are still lacking. This study investigates the observed thermal response of Pressure Treated Wood (PTW) and Trex Enhance (Trex) composite decking under exposure to 8 grams firebrand piles (10 cm × 5 cm x 2 cm) at large-scale decking assembly (60 cm × 60 cm). Experimental conditions involved different constant wind speed (1.4 m s-1 and 2.7 m s-1); moisture content (MC) of tested materials (PTW: 26% and 7%; Trex: <1%); and firebrand pile orientation (0°: 10 cm side parallel to airflow; and 90°: 10 cm side perpendicular to airflow). For PTW experiments, three key events were observed: 1) Burn-through: when the samples experienced vertical propagation until a glowing-edged opening >5 mm appeared at the back surface; 2) Back surface flaming ignition: when transition from smouldering to intense flaming ignition took place at the back surface; and 3) Back surface re-ignition: when flaming ignition appeared second time at the back surface but at lower intensity. For PTW, the higher wind speed (2.7 m s-1) was the dominant factor associated with significantly increased likelihood of burn-through and was a necessary factor in inducing back surface flaming. The low MC (7%) also increased the propensity for burn-through and back surface flaming, though to a lesser extent. Although firebrand pile orientation showed insignificant impact on the overall thermal response, it still played a critical role. The 90° orientation increased the burn-through propensity, while 0° orientation displayed a greater tendency for back surface flaming and its associated characteristics. Compared to PTW, Trex exhibited considerably lower combustion intensity and duration, with no observations of burn-through or back surface flaming in any experiment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2026.100463
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the thermal response of large-scale decking assemblies exposed to firebrand piles

Mohamed E. Mohamed, Alexander I. Filkov, Trent D. Penman, Gavin P. Horn et al.
Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Evaluating the thermal response of large-scale decking assemblies exposed to firebrand piles

Mohamed E. Mohamed, Alexander I. Filkov, Trent D. Penman, Gavin P. Horn, Stanislav I. Stoliarov, Jacques De Beer
article en

Abstract

Firebrand accumulation in the form of piles significantly contribute to structural losses in the Wildland-Urban Interface. Decking materials may be particularly vulnerable to ignition from firebrand piles. However, large-scale studies replicating real-world conditions are still lacking. This study investigates the observed thermal response of Pressure Treated Wood (PTW) and Trex Enhance (Trex) composite decking under exposure to 8 grams firebrand piles (10 cm × 5 cm x 2 cm) at large-scale decking assembly (60 cm × 60 cm). Experimental conditions involved different constant wind speed (1.4 m s-1 and 2.7 m s-1); moisture content (MC) of tested materials (PTW: 26% and 7%; Trex: <1%); and firebrand pile orientation (0°: 10 cm side parallel to airflow; and 90°: 10 cm side perpendicular to airflow). For PTW experiments, three key events were observed: 1) Burn-through: when the samples experienced vertical propagation until a glowing-edged opening >5 mm appeared at the back surface; 2) Back surface flaming ignition: when transition from smouldering to intense flaming ignition took place at the back surface; and 3) Back surface re-ignition: when flaming ignition appeared second time at the back surface but at lower intensity. For PTW, the higher wind speed (2.7 m s-1) was the dominant factor associated with significantly increased likelihood of burn-through and was a necessary factor in inducing back surface flaming. The low MC (7%) also increased the propensity for burn-through and back surface flaming, though to a lesser extent. Although firebrand pile orientation showed insignificant impact on the overall thermal response, it still played a critical role. The 90° orientation increased the burn-through propensity, while 0° orientation displayed a greater tendency for back surface flaming and its associated characteristics. Compared to PTW, Trex exhibited considerably lower combustion intensity and duration, with no observations of burn-through or back surface flaming in any experiment.

Applications in Energy and Combustion ScienceVol. 25
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.