Resistance, Ineffectiveness, and Off-Label Use Related to Cephalosporins from the Reserve Group—A Pharmacovigilance Signal Detection Study on EudraVigilance Database

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considered a major threat by the healthcare community. In this context, the AWaRe (Access, Watch, Reserve) classification of antibiotics is a valuable tool that can assist physicians during the clinical decision process and pharmacists in promoting the rational use of antibiotics. Pharmacovigilance studies based on real-world evidence offer valuable insight into the AMR phenomenon. The aim of this study was the assessment of the resistance, ineffectiveness, and off-label use signals of all five cephalosporins belonging to the Reserve group (ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftaroline, cetolozane/tazobactam, ceftobiprole, and cefiderocol). <b>Methods</b>: The study was conducted using descriptive approaches on EudraVigilance data and disproportionality analyses comparing each of the fourteen cephalosporins in the Watch group. <b>Results</b>: Ceftazidime/avibactam (<i>n</i> = 904, 38.6%) topped the reports, followed by ceftaroline (<i>n</i> = 559, 23.9%) and ceftolazane/tazobactam (<i>n</i> = 560, 23.9%). The lowest number of reports was submitted for cefiderocol (<i>n</i> = 176, 7.5%) and ceftobiprole (<i>n</i> = 146, 6.2%). The resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, and ceftolozane/tazobactam was reported with a higher probability than all others, the strongest signal being observed for cefiderocol against cefixime (ROR: 171.25, 95% CI 79.64-368.27). All cephalosporins from the Reserve group (except ceftobiprole) have higher probability for reporting ineffectiveness than cephalosporins from the Watch group; the strongest signal was observed for cefiderocol-cefditoren (ROR: 14.70, 95% CI 6.73-32.11). All cephalosporines from the Reserve group had a higher probability of reporting off-label use by comparison with the ones from the Watch group, except for two cases of no disproportionate signal between cefiderocol-cefoperazone and cefiderocol-ceftizoxime; the strongest signal was observed for ceftolozane/tazobactam-cefotaxim (ROR: 43.61, 95% CI 30.14-63.09). <b>Conclusions</b>: This analysis supplements information from clinical trials and current clinical practice, underscoring the critical need for rigorous antibiotic stewardship programs. Notably, even restricted use of cephalosporins demonstrated therapeutic failure and inappropriate utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19010155
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resistance, Ineffectiveness, and Off-Label Use Related to Cephalosporins from the Reserve Group—A Pharmacovigilance Signal Detection Study on EudraVigilance Database

Bogdan Ioan Vintilă, Adina Frum, Adriana Aurelia Chiş, Anca Butucă et al.
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

Resistance, Ineffectiveness, and Off-Label Use Related to Cephalosporins from the Reserve Group—A Pharmacovigilance Signal Detection Study on EudraVigilance Database

Bogdan Ioan Vintilă, Adina Frum, Adriana Aurelia Chiş, Anca Butucă, Carmen Maximiliana Dobrea, Laurenţiu Stoicescu, Rares Arseniu, Felicia Gabriela Gligor, Steliana Ghibu, Claudiu Morgovan, Anca Maria Arseniu
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considered a major threat by the healthcare community. In this context, the AWaRe (Access, Watch, Reserve) classification of antibiotics is a valuable tool that can assist physicians during the clinical decision process and pharmacists in promoting the rational use of antibiotics. Pharmacovigilance studies based on real-world evidence offer valuable insight into the AMR phenomenon. The aim of this study was the assessment of the resistance, ineffectiveness, and off-label use signals of all five cephalosporins belonging to the Reserve group (ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftaroline, cetolozane/tazobactam, ceftobiprole, and cefiderocol). <b>Methods</b>: The study was conducted using descriptive approaches on EudraVigilance data and disproportionality analyses comparing each of the fourteen cephalosporins in the Watch group. <b>Results</b>: Ceftazidime/avibactam (<i>n</i> = 904, 38.6%) topped the reports, followed by ceftaroline (<i>n</i> = 559, 23.9%) and ceftolazane/tazobactam (<i>n</i> = 560, 23.9%). The lowest number of reports was submitted for cefiderocol (<i>n</i> = 176, 7.5%) and ceftobiprole (<i>n</i> = 146, 6.2%). The resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, and ceftolozane/tazobactam was reported with a higher probability than all others, the strongest signal being observed for cefiderocol against cefixime (ROR: 171.25, 95% CI 79.64-368.27). All cephalosporins from the Reserve group (except ceftobiprole) have higher probability for reporting ineffectiveness than cephalosporins from the Watch group; the strongest signal was observed for cefiderocol-cefditoren (ROR: 14.70, 95% CI 6.73-32.11). All cephalosporines from the Reserve group had a higher probability of reporting off-label use by comparison with the ones from the Watch group, except for two cases of no disproportionate signal between cefiderocol-cefoperazone and cefiderocol-ceftizoxime; the strongest signal was observed for ceftolozane/tazobactam-cefotaxim (ROR: 43.61, 95% CI 30.14-63.09). <b>Conclusions</b>: This analysis supplements information from clinical trials and current clinical practice, underscoring the critical need for rigorous antibiotic stewardship programs. Notably, even restricted use of cephalosporins demonstrated therapeutic failure and inappropriate utilization.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 19(1)
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO), Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), National Institute For Chemical Pharmaceutical Research and Development (RO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.