Relative contributions of upper-body muscular power and repeated sprint ability to 50-m freestyle swimming performance in competitive swimmers

Upper-body muscular power and repeated sprint ability are recognized as important contributors to sprint swimming performance. However, the relative and combined predictive value of dry-land power measures and in-water repeated sprint ability for 50-m freestyle performance remains insufficiently understood. This study aimed to examine the relationships between upper-body muscular power, repeated sprint swimming variables (RSS), and 50-m freestyle performance in competitive swimmers. Thirty-six national-level male swimmers (age: 16.4 ± 0.3 years) participated in this cross-sectional study. Each swimmer completed: (1) an upper-body load-velocity assessment using the bench press on a Smith machine equipped with a linear position transducer to determine peak power; (2) an in-water repeated sprint test (8 × 15 m, 30 s rest) to determine fastest time, mean time, fatigue index, and total time; and (3) a maximal 50-m freestyle time trial. Pearson correlations revealed a very strong negative relationship between maximum muscular power and 50-m time (r = -0.86, <i>p</i> < 0.001), indicating that higher power was associated with faster swim performance. Among the RSS variables, fastest time (r = 0.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001), mean time (r = 0.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and total time (r = 0.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001) showed significant positive correlations with 50-m time, while fatigue index was not significantly related (r = 0.05, <i>p</i> = 0.78). The multiple regression model significantly predicted 50-m performance (R² = 0.86, <i>p</i> < 0.001), but only maximum muscular power emerged as an independent significant predictor (<i>β</i> = -0.027, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Upper-body muscular power was the strongest determinant of 50-m freestyle performance, explaining most of the variance in sprint time, while repeated sprint swimming variables reflect related in-water expressions of sprint capacity. Coaches should prioritize the development of dry-land power capacity alongside in-water anaerobic conditioning to enhance sprint performance. Combining load-velocity profiling and repeated sprint testing offers a complementary and practical framework for performance monitoring and individualized training prescription in competitive swimmers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1751687
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relative contributions of upper-body muscular power and repeated sprint ability to 50-m freestyle swimming performance in competitive swimmers

Roland Johannes Wilhelmus van den Tillaar, Sofiene Amara, Anissa Bouassida
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Sports Performance and Training
article

Relative contributions of upper-body muscular power and repeated sprint ability to 50-m freestyle swimming performance in competitive swimmers

Roland Johannes Wilhelmus van den Tillaar, Sofiene Amara, Anissa Bouassida
article en

Abstract

Upper-body muscular power and repeated sprint ability are recognized as important contributors to sprint swimming performance. However, the relative and combined predictive value of dry-land power measures and in-water repeated sprint ability for 50-m freestyle performance remains insufficiently understood. This study aimed to examine the relationships between upper-body muscular power, repeated sprint swimming variables (RSS), and 50-m freestyle performance in competitive swimmers. Thirty-six national-level male swimmers (age: 16.4 ± 0.3 years) participated in this cross-sectional study. Each swimmer completed: (1) an upper-body load-velocity assessment using the bench press on a Smith machine equipped with a linear position transducer to determine peak power; (2) an in-water repeated sprint test (8 × 15 m, 30 s rest) to determine fastest time, mean time, fatigue index, and total time; and (3) a maximal 50-m freestyle time trial. Pearson correlations revealed a very strong negative relationship between maximum muscular power and 50-m time (r = -0.86, <i>p</i> < 0.001), indicating that higher power was associated with faster swim performance. Among the RSS variables, fastest time (r = 0.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001), mean time (r = 0.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and total time (r = 0.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001) showed significant positive correlations with 50-m time, while fatigue index was not significantly related (r = 0.05, <i>p</i> = 0.78). The multiple regression model significantly predicted 50-m performance (R² = 0.86, <i>p</i> < 0.001), but only maximum muscular power emerged as an independent significant predictor (<i>β</i> = -0.027, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Upper-body muscular power was the strongest determinant of 50-m freestyle performance, explaining most of the variance in sprint time, while repeated sprint swimming variables reflect related in-water expressions of sprint capacity. Coaches should prioritize the development of dry-land power capacity alongside in-water anaerobic conditioning to enhance sprint performance. Combining load-velocity profiling and repeated sprint testing offers a complementary and practical framework for performance monitoring and individualized training prescription in competitive swimmers.

Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingVol. 7
Nord University (NO), University of Jendouba (TN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.