Why do you dislike AI algorithmic decision-making? Perspectives from interaction frameworks and emotion theories

Purpose This paper explores the key factors inhibiting algorithm aversion from the perspectives of information, emotion, control and social interaction based on the interactive experience framework, and discusses the moderating role of emotion types. Design/methodology/approach Based on offline retail scenarios, this study designed two sub-studies using a combination of between-group experiments and PLS-SEM; a total of 541 online sample data were used to verify the relevant factors affecting consumers' algorithm aversion from the perspective of the interaction experience framework. Findings The findings show that: (1) Interactive (compared to advisory) AI-assisted product selection can promote higher-quality interactive experiences for consumers and inhibit consumers' algorithm aversion. (2) Information interaction, emotional interaction, control interaction and social interaction all significantly affect consumers' algorithm aversion and have significant mediating effects. (3) Emotion types play a significant moderating role in the path between AI-assisted product selection modes and algorithm aversion. Among them, positive emotions help consumers project their self-emotions into the interactive process of AI algorithm decision-making, which is conducive to further alleviating algorithm aversion in the advisory AI-assisted product selection mode. Originality/value Compared with previous studies, this paper enriches the understanding of algorithm aversion, expands the value of the interaction framework and emotion theory in guiding consumer behavior and can provide practical guidance and insights for brands and AI developers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-08-2025-0494
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why do you dislike AI algorithmic decision-making? Perspectives from interaction frameworks and emotion theories

Qixuan Liu, Yueqi Dong, Dong Luo, Xiaoyi Zhang
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
AI in Service Interactions
article

Why do you dislike AI algorithmic decision-making? Perspectives from interaction frameworks and emotion theories

Qixuan Liu, Yueqi Dong, Dong Luo, Xiaoyi Zhang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper explores the key factors inhibiting algorithm aversion from the perspectives of information, emotion, control and social interaction based on the interactive experience framework, and discusses the moderating role of emotion types. Design/methodology/approach Based on offline retail scenarios, this study designed two sub-studies using a combination of between-group experiments and PLS-SEM; a total of 541 online sample data were used to verify the relevant factors affecting consumers' algorithm aversion from the perspective of the interaction experience framework. Findings The findings show that: (1) Interactive (compared to advisory) AI-assisted product selection can promote higher-quality interactive experiences for consumers and inhibit consumers' algorithm aversion. (2) Information interaction, emotional interaction, control interaction and social interaction all significantly affect consumers' algorithm aversion and have significant mediating effects. (3) Emotion types play a significant moderating role in the path between AI-assisted product selection modes and algorithm aversion. Among them, positive emotions help consumers project their self-emotions into the interactive process of AI algorithm decision-making, which is conducive to further alleviating algorithm aversion in the advisory AI-assisted product selection mode. Originality/value Compared with previous studies, this paper enriches the understanding of algorithm aversion, expands the value of the interaction framework and emotion theory in guiding consumer behavior and can provide practical guidance and insights for brands and AI developers.

Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology University (CN), Jilin Agricultural University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why do you dislike AI algorithmic decision-making? Perspectives from interaction frameworks and emotion theories — Qixuan Liu, Yueqi Dong, et al. · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS