Proximal sensing of horticultural crops with mobile device LiDAR

• Mobile device LiDAR and RGB sensing was evaluated as a data collection tool. • Pepper, tomato, and watermelon plants were scanned across their production cycle. • Spatial accuracy of generated point clouds was comparatively high, with some error. • Structural biomass and structure numbers were estimated from point cloud volume. • Structural estimation accuracies were high for watermelon, lower for tomato. Robust, multipurpose 3D plant model datasets are critical for the development of phenotyping and structural characteristic estimation methods. This study details the construction of a multi-crop 3D point cloud dataset collected in-situ, tests the efficacy of HSV thresholding on colorized point cloud data to segment target plants, and evaluates the efficacy of mobile device LiDAR sensors for plant structural data collection. Across the agricultural season, a mobile device LiDAR sensor was used to collect 295 colorized point clouds of pepper, tomato, and watermelon plants. Segmentation with HSV thresholding and processing resulted in an mIoU score of 89%. Spatial accuracy of the sensor was assessed through comparison of physically measured and sensed tomato plant height, yielding a strong regression fit (R 2 = 0.95), but with significant error (RMSE = 5 cm). To assess the sensor’s structural characteristic estimation capabilities, aboveground vegetative biomass, leaf and stem biomass, and leaf and stem number were physically measured in tomato and watermelon plants. Convex hull volume and voxel volume at multiple voxel sizes were related to biomass and structure counts using NLS regression. Regressions between plant volume and structural characteristics showed a strong relationship between each crop and the structural characteristics (R 2 = 0.86-0.98). Relative error was high in tomato estimates (RRMSE = 22-38%), but comparable in performance to other sensors in watermelon estimates (RRMSE = 12-23%). The spatial and structural characteristic estimation error was attributed to the sensor and scanning software, restricting mobile device LiDAR’s data collection utility with current technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2026.101799
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proximal sensing of horticultural crops with mobile device LiDAR

Ankita Raturi, Steven Doyle
Smart Agricultural Technology
Smart Agriculture and AI
article

Proximal sensing of horticultural crops with mobile device LiDAR

Ankita Raturi, Steven Doyle
article en

Abstract

• Mobile device LiDAR and RGB sensing was evaluated as a data collection tool. • Pepper, tomato, and watermelon plants were scanned across their production cycle. • Spatial accuracy of generated point clouds was comparatively high, with some error. • Structural biomass and structure numbers were estimated from point cloud volume. • Structural estimation accuracies were high for watermelon, lower for tomato. Robust, multipurpose 3D plant model datasets are critical for the development of phenotyping and structural characteristic estimation methods. This study details the construction of a multi-crop 3D point cloud dataset collected in-situ, tests the efficacy of HSV thresholding on colorized point cloud data to segment target plants, and evaluates the efficacy of mobile device LiDAR sensors for plant structural data collection. Across the agricultural season, a mobile device LiDAR sensor was used to collect 295 colorized point clouds of pepper, tomato, and watermelon plants. Segmentation with HSV thresholding and processing resulted in an mIoU score of 89%. Spatial accuracy of the sensor was assessed through comparison of physically measured and sensed tomato plant height, yielding a strong regression fit (R 2 = 0.95), but with significant error (RMSE = 5 cm). To assess the sensor’s structural characteristic estimation capabilities, aboveground vegetative biomass, leaf and stem biomass, and leaf and stem number were physically measured in tomato and watermelon plants. Convex hull volume and voxel volume at multiple voxel sizes were related to biomass and structure counts using NLS regression. Regressions between plant volume and structural characteristics showed a strong relationship between each crop and the structural characteristics (R 2 = 0.86-0.98). Relative error was high in tomato estimates (RRMSE = 22-38%), but comparable in performance to other sensors in watermelon estimates (RRMSE = 12-23%). The spatial and structural characteristic estimation error was attributed to the sensor and scanning software, restricting mobile device LiDAR’s data collection utility with current technology.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 13
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Smart Agriculture and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.