A study on the stimulation and guidance of intrinsic motivation among engineering college students in China

Background Against the backdrop of rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and information technology, engineering university students face complex learning challenges. However, existing tools for measuring their intrinsic motivation—a crucial driver of learning—often lack cultural adaptability in the Chinese context, and systematic intervention strategies are scarce. Methods Based on Self-Determination Theory and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, we developed and locally adapted the Chinese College Student’s Intrinsic Motivation Learning Questionnaire (CIMLQ), removing the less applicable “Relatedness” dimension. The final 30-item instrument covers six dimensions: Interest/Enjoyment, Perceived Competence, Effort, Pressure/Tension, Perceived Choice, and Value/Usefulness. Its reliability and validity were tested with 450 engineering students. Subsequently, a 19-week randomized controlled trial ( N = 600) was conducted, comparing an experimental group receiving multidimensional motivation strategies (e.g., goal contracting, choice provision) with a control group under conventional instruction. Results Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated good structural validity (cumulative variance explained: 66.13%) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.829–0.891). The teaching experiment revealed that the experimental group showed a significantly higher post-intervention intrinsic motivation score (119.20 vs. 97.81, * p * < 0.001, a 21.8% increase) and better academic performance (80.10 vs. 76.57, * p * = 0.001) compared to the control group. Conclusion The CIMLQ proves to be a reliable and valid measure for assessing intrinsic motivation among Chinese engineering students. The findings provide empirical evidence that structured instructional interventions, designed based on the CIMLQ dimensions, can effectively enhance both intrinsic motivation and academic outcomes. This study offers a practical framework for fostering self-directed learning capabilities that are essential for adapting to evolving educational environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1733781
Primary Topic
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study on the stimulation and guidance of intrinsic motivation among engineering college students in China

Guangya Yang, Dong Han
Frontiers in Education
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
article

A study on the stimulation and guidance of intrinsic motivation among engineering college students in China

Guangya Yang, Dong Han
article en

Abstract

Background Against the backdrop of rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and information technology, engineering university students face complex learning challenges. However, existing tools for measuring their intrinsic motivation—a crucial driver of learning—often lack cultural adaptability in the Chinese context, and systematic intervention strategies are scarce. Methods Based on Self-Determination Theory and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, we developed and locally adapted the Chinese College Student’s Intrinsic Motivation Learning Questionnaire (CIMLQ), removing the less applicable “Relatedness” dimension. The final 30-item instrument covers six dimensions: Interest/Enjoyment, Perceived Competence, Effort, Pressure/Tension, Perceived Choice, and Value/Usefulness. Its reliability and validity were tested with 450 engineering students. Subsequently, a 19-week randomized controlled trial ( N = 600) was conducted, comparing an experimental group receiving multidimensional motivation strategies (e.g., goal contracting, choice provision) with a control group under conventional instruction. Results Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated good structural validity (cumulative variance explained: 66.13%) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.829–0.891). The teaching experiment revealed that the experimental group showed a significantly higher post-intervention intrinsic motivation score (119.20 vs. 97.81, * p * < 0.001, a 21.8% increase) and better academic performance (80.10 vs. 76.57, * p * = 0.001) compared to the control group. Conclusion The CIMLQ proves to be a reliable and valid measure for assessing intrinsic motivation among Chinese engineering students. The findings provide empirical evidence that structured instructional interventions, designed based on the CIMLQ dimensions, can effectively enhance both intrinsic motivation and academic outcomes. This study offers a practical framework for fostering self-directed learning capabilities that are essential for adapting to evolving educational environments.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
Northeast Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.