Geomechanical Unload‐Reload Response of Cylindrical Cavities for Wellbore Stability

ABSTRACT Subsurface exploration typically requires application of cycles of fluid pressures on the surface of the cylindrical cavity during wellbore circulation. In this study, a numerical model is proposed that can capture the evolution of the elastic‐plastic boundary and the shear‐induced porosity/ stiffness changes during the cycles of cavity contraction and expansion. The developed solver is benchmarked against the existing experimental data and other numerical solutions. During pressure‐induced unloading and reloading of the cavity, increments are chosen so that the model satisfies the equilibrium conditions. When the stress state is reduced from the in situ stress to zero stress at the cavity boundary and then reloaded to a load ratio, it is observed that the material exhibits a stiffer, apparent elastic‐dominated response at higher load ratios. Additionally, when the porosity is updated for each material point, the maximum radial displacement during unloading increases by nearly 20%, and the recovered stress after reloading decreases by approximately 15% compared to the case of constant porosity. Parametric studies on dimensionless factors further reveal that higher (effect of shear modulus) and (effect of pre‐consolidation pressure) values lead to narrower hysteresis loops, indicating that the medium reaches an elastic‐dominated response more rapidly. Quantitatively, increasing from 25.82 to 60.26 (with ) reduces the final specific energy by nearly 70%, while increasing from 1.25 to 2.00 (with ) results in a 30% reduction in energy dissipation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70238
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geomechanical Unload‐Reload Response of Cylindrical Cavities for Wellbore Stability

Jithin S. Kumar, Ramesh Kannan Kandasami, Abhijit Chaudhuri
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Geomechanical Unload‐Reload Response of Cylindrical Cavities for Wellbore Stability

Jithin S. Kumar, Ramesh Kannan Kandasami, Abhijit Chaudhuri
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Subsurface exploration typically requires application of cycles of fluid pressures on the surface of the cylindrical cavity during wellbore circulation. In this study, a numerical model is proposed that can capture the evolution of the elastic‐plastic boundary and the shear‐induced porosity/ stiffness changes during the cycles of cavity contraction and expansion. The developed solver is benchmarked against the existing experimental data and other numerical solutions. During pressure‐induced unloading and reloading of the cavity, increments are chosen so that the model satisfies the equilibrium conditions. When the stress state is reduced from the in situ stress to zero stress at the cavity boundary and then reloaded to a load ratio, it is observed that the material exhibits a stiffer, apparent elastic‐dominated response at higher load ratios. Additionally, when the porosity is updated for each material point, the maximum radial displacement during unloading increases by nearly 20%, and the recovered stress after reloading decreases by approximately 15% compared to the case of constant porosity. Parametric studies on dimensionless factors further reveal that higher (effect of shear modulus) and (effect of pre‐consolidation pressure) values lead to narrower hysteresis loops, indicating that the medium reaches an elastic‐dominated response more rapidly. Quantitatively, increasing from 25.82 to 60.26 (with ) reduces the final specific energy by nearly 70%, while increasing from 1.25 to 2.00 (with ) results in a 30% reduction in energy dissipation.

International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in GeomechanicsVol. 50(5)
Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geomechanical Unload‐Reload Response of Cylindrical Cavities for Wellbore Stability — Jithin S. Kumar, Ramesh Kannan Kandasami, et al. · International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS