Comparative Evaluation of H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC for DVB-T2: Rate–Distortion, Complexity, and Capacity Implications

With the increasing demand for efficient video delivery over terrestrial broadcasting systems, selecting the appropriate video compression standard is crucial for optimizing bandwidth usage and maintaining high-quality transmissions. This study presents a comparative analysis of MPEG-4 (H.264/AVC) and HEVC (H.265) video compression standards in the context of Digital Video Broadcasting - Second Generation Terrestrial (DVB-T2) transmission. MPEG-4 has been widely adopted in previous broadcasting systems, while HEVC offers improved compression efficiency, making it a promising alternative for modern broadcasting applications. The research evaluates both codecs based on key performance metrics including compression ratio, video quality (measured via PSNR and SSIM), bitrate efficiency, and computational complexity. Test scenarios are developed using standard-definition and high-definition video content, encoded under similar transmission parameters suitable for DVB-T2. The results demonstrate that HEVC achieves up to 50% bitrate savings compared to MPEG-4 for equivalent video quality, thereby allowing more channels or higher quality content within the same bandwidth. However, HEVC's increased encoding complexity and hardware requirements are noted as potential limitations for deployment in existing infrastructure. This analysis provides critical insights into the trade-offs between legacy and next-generation codecs for DVB-T2 broadcasting, supporting broadcasters and policymakers in making informed decisions regarding system upgrades and spectrum management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4314/fuoyejet.v10i3.11
Primary Topic
Video Coding and Compression Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC for DVB-T2: Rate–Distortion, Complexity, and Capacity Implications

Ayodele S. Oluwole, Olaitan Akinsanmi, Atinuola Elizabeth Ayeoribe, Iyiola Victor Ayeoribe et al.
FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology
Video Coding and Compression Technologies
article

Comparative Evaluation of H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC for DVB-T2: Rate–Distortion, Complexity, and Capacity Implications

Ayodele S. Oluwole, Olaitan Akinsanmi, Atinuola Elizabeth Ayeoribe, Iyiola Victor Ayeoribe, Bolaji A. Omodunbi, Olarewaju Peter-Ayeoribe
article en

Abstract

With the increasing demand for efficient video delivery over terrestrial broadcasting systems, selecting the appropriate video compression standard is crucial for optimizing bandwidth usage and maintaining high-quality transmissions. This study presents a comparative analysis of MPEG-4 (H.264/AVC) and HEVC (H.265) video compression standards in the context of Digital Video Broadcasting - Second Generation Terrestrial (DVB-T2) transmission. MPEG-4 has been widely adopted in previous broadcasting systems, while HEVC offers improved compression efficiency, making it a promising alternative for modern broadcasting applications. The research evaluates both codecs based on key performance metrics including compression ratio, video quality (measured via PSNR and SSIM), bitrate efficiency, and computational complexity. Test scenarios are developed using standard-definition and high-definition video content, encoded under similar transmission parameters suitable for DVB-T2. The results demonstrate that HEVC achieves up to 50% bitrate savings compared to MPEG-4 for equivalent video quality, thereby allowing more channels or higher quality content within the same bandwidth. However, HEVC's increased encoding complexity and hardware requirements are noted as potential limitations for deployment in existing infrastructure. This analysis provides critical insights into the trade-offs between legacy and next-generation codecs for DVB-T2 broadcasting, supporting broadcasters and policymakers in making informed decisions regarding system upgrades and spectrum management.

FUOYE Journal of Engineering and TechnologyVol. 10(3)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Video Coding and Compression Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.