Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of superficial and deep serratus anterior plane blocks in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a prospective randomized single blind study

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of superficial and deep serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB) for simple mastectomy and modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h. Secondary aims included pain scores, rescue analgesic and antiemetic requirement, nausea and vomiting incidence, and patient satisfaction. Patients were randomized to the superficial or deep SAPB group. Superficial or deep SAPB was applied with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine above or below the serratus anterior muscle, respectively. Postoperative pain control was provided by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine. Pain was assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), whereas both pain and morphine consumption were evaluated at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Rescue analgesic and anti-emetic requirement, rescue analgesic dose, PCA bolus request count, nausea and vomiting severity, and satisfaction scores were also evaluated. Cumulative morphine consumption at 24th hour was similar between groups (p = 0.248, effect size = -0.17). Numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores were slightly lower in the Deep SAPB group at PACU at 6, 12, and 24 h (p < 0.001, p = 0.020, 0.034, and 0.020, respectively; effect sizes = -0.46, -0.33, -0.31, and − 0.33, respectively). Anti-emetic use was lower (p = 0.017, effect size = 0.370), whereas patient satisfaction was higher in the deep SAPB group (p = 0.024, effect size = 0.280). There was no significant difference in PCA bolus request count, rescue analgesic requirement, and dose. Although cumulative morphine consumption was similar, deep SAPB yielded slightly lower NRS scores, reduced the need for antiemetics, and modestly higher patient satisfaction, warranting further studies to determine the clinical advantage. The study was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on 29 May 2024 and can be retrieved via https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06438211 (NCT06438211).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03627-z
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of superficial and deep serratus anterior plane blocks in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a prospective randomized single blind study

Ayşe Ülgey, Erhan Sönmez, Ahmet Taşar, Mustafa Gök et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of superficial and deep serratus anterior plane blocks in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a prospective randomized single blind study

Ayşe Ülgey, Erhan Sönmez, Ahmet Taşar, Mustafa Gök, Gamze Talih
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of superficial and deep serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB) for simple mastectomy and modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h. Secondary aims included pain scores, rescue analgesic and antiemetic requirement, nausea and vomiting incidence, and patient satisfaction. Patients were randomized to the superficial or deep SAPB group. Superficial or deep SAPB was applied with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine above or below the serratus anterior muscle, respectively. Postoperative pain control was provided by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine. Pain was assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), whereas both pain and morphine consumption were evaluated at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Rescue analgesic and anti-emetic requirement, rescue analgesic dose, PCA bolus request count, nausea and vomiting severity, and satisfaction scores were also evaluated. Cumulative morphine consumption at 24th hour was similar between groups (p = 0.248, effect size = -0.17). Numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores were slightly lower in the Deep SAPB group at PACU at 6, 12, and 24 h (p < 0.001, p = 0.020, 0.034, and 0.020, respectively; effect sizes = -0.46, -0.33, -0.31, and − 0.33, respectively). Anti-emetic use was lower (p = 0.017, effect size = 0.370), whereas patient satisfaction was higher in the deep SAPB group (p = 0.024, effect size = 0.280). There was no significant difference in PCA bolus request count, rescue analgesic requirement, and dose. Although cumulative morphine consumption was similar, deep SAPB yielded slightly lower NRS scores, reduced the need for antiemetics, and modestly higher patient satisfaction, warranting further studies to determine the clinical advantage. The study was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on 29 May 2024 and can be retrieved via https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06438211 (NCT06438211).

BMC AnesthesiologyVol. 26(1)
State Hospital (GB), Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR), Erciyes University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.