Usporedba kvadratne Msplit metode i apsolutne Msplit metode - studija slučaja

In this paper we analyse and compare two modern methods of deformation analysis: the squared Msplit method and the absolute Msplit method. The comparison is made on cases of simulated and actually measured horizontal geodetic networks. The squared Msplit method is based on the assumptions of the least square method, while the absolute Msplit method is based on the assumptions of the least absolute deviation method. For each method, we developed a computer programme and used it to calculate point displacements in both a simulated and a measured 2D geodetic network. The purpose of this article is to compare the displacements. The results of the two methods differ by up to about one centimetre in the simulated network and by less than two centimetres in the actually measured geodetic network.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Published
2026-01-12
Primary Topic
Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usporedba kvadratne Msplit metode i apsolutne Msplit metode - studija slučaja

Gašper Rak, Klemen Kregar, Amir Hajdar, Tomaž Ambrožič et al.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
article

Usporedba kvadratne Msplit metode i apsolutne Msplit metode - studija slučaja

Gašper Rak, Klemen Kregar, Amir Hajdar, Tomaž Ambrožič, Muamer Đidelija, Žan Pleterski
article en

Abstract

In this paper we analyse and compare two modern methods of deformation analysis: the squared Msplit method and the absolute Msplit method. The comparison is made on cases of simulated and actually measured horizontal geodetic networks. The squared Msplit method is based on the assumptions of the least square method, while the absolute Msplit method is based on the assumptions of the least absolute deviation method. For each method, we developed a computer programme and used it to calculate point displacements in both a simulated and a measured 2D geodetic network. The purpose of this article is to compare the displacements. The results of the two methods differ by up to about one centimetre in the simulated network and by less than two centimetres in the actually measured geodetic network.

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Usporedba kvadratne Msplit metode i apsolutne Msplit metode - studija slučaja — Gašper Rak, Klemen Kregar, et al. · Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS