Developing university teaching through the scholarship of teaching and learning: A systematic review of recent literature

In this presentation we report the results of our systematic review of recent empirical studies that focus on making use of the scholarship of teaching and learning to support the development of university teaching. Given its potential as a strategy for individual development and, as importantly, for a university’s “aggregated ability to support student learning” (Mårtensson, Roxå, & Olsson, 2011, p.52), SoTL is widely understood as a signature pedagogy of educational development (Felten & Chick, 2018). However, SoTL has an unclear position in contemporary universities because it is one form of practitioner inquiry among others, including participatory action research, teacher research, and self-study, with which it shares a number of common characteristics. In its embodiment of an ‘inquiry stance’, SoTL as practitioner research can be both pedagogyand scholarship (Cruz, Steiner, & Cruz, 2024), an ambiguity which is in part the source of the discomfort and disruption that it can cause in dividing it “from more traditional forms and paradigms of educational research” (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 2009, p.46). Given these complexities, what do empirical studies suggest about the potential of SoTL to support and develop university teaching? What are the bene]ts and challenges of using SoTL to these ends? What gaps exist in the current literature on this topic? Our review suggests: 1) a relative lack of studies that provide empirical evidence for the assumption that building academics’ knowledge of their teaching and their students’ learning through engaging inSoTL can positively impact their learning about teaching; (2) that the literature on the development of university teaching through SoTL by and large does not connect with that on teaching expertise, which is surprising, assuming that teaching expertise would be an important aspect of the development of university teaching (e.g. Stigler & Miller, 2008; van Dijk et al., 2020).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Published
2025-10-15
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing university teaching through the scholarship of teaching and learning: A systematic review of recent literature

Katarina Mårtensson, Johan Geertsema
Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Developing university teaching through the scholarship of teaching and learning: A systematic review of recent literature

Katarina Mårtensson, Johan Geertsema
article en

Abstract

In this presentation we report the results of our systematic review of recent empirical studies that focus on making use of the scholarship of teaching and learning to support the development of university teaching. Given its potential as a strategy for individual development and, as importantly, for a university’s “aggregated ability to support student learning” (Mårtensson, Roxå, & Olsson, 2011, p.52), SoTL is widely understood as a signature pedagogy of educational development (Felten & Chick, 2018). However, SoTL has an unclear position in contemporary universities because it is one form of practitioner inquiry among others, including participatory action research, teacher research, and self-study, with which it shares a number of common characteristics. In its embodiment of an ‘inquiry stance’, SoTL as practitioner research can be both pedagogyand scholarship (Cruz, Steiner, & Cruz, 2024), an ambiguity which is in part the source of the discomfort and disruption that it can cause in dividing it “from more traditional forms and paradigms of educational research” (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 2009, p.46). Given these complexities, what do empirical studies suggest about the potential of SoTL to support and develop university teaching? What are the bene]ts and challenges of using SoTL to these ends? What gaps exist in the current literature on this topic? Our review suggests: 1) a relative lack of studies that provide empirical evidence for the assumption that building academics’ knowledge of their teaching and their students’ learning through engaging inSoTL can positively impact their learning about teaching; (2) that the literature on the development of university teaching through SoTL by and large does not connect with that on teaching expertise, which is surprising, assuming that teaching expertise would be an important aspect of the development of university teaching (e.g. Stigler & Miller, 2008; van Dijk et al., 2020).

Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.