How gender differences divide physics classroom practices:Focus group discussions with teachers and students

Discrepancies in educational outcomes and school career opportunities between boys and girls exist. Physics has long been perceived as a male-dominated field, with persistent gender differences in participation, performance, and attitudes toward the subject. Despite extensive studies, there is no comprehensive understanding of the inequities in education based on gender. Research comparing physics classroom practices of teachers and students in addressing gender differences is particularly lacking. The personal experiences of teachers and students regarding gender differences in upper secondary Dutch physics education are the scope of this study. Data were obtained from focus group discussions with teachers and students in which their ideas on gender differences in the physics classrooms were discussed. The subjects covered student learning characteristics, teacher‒student-interactions and learning materials. Overall, gender differences were mentioned primarily in teacher‒student-interactions (e.g. girls asking more questions) and in different student learning characteristics (e.g. girls demonstrating more effort, boys overestimating themselves more). Gender differences in learning materials were only addressed by teachers, not by students. Suggested improvements, by students and teachers, for physics classroom practices are discussed. These findings address the aspiration of students and teachers to receive and use practical guidelines for gender equitable physics education in their classrooms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tilburg University Research Portal
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How gender differences divide physics classroom practices:Focus group discussions with teachers and students

Marije van Amelsvoort, Rian; id_orcid 0000-0003-0632-5853 Aarts, Natascha; id_orcid 0009-0009-5826-6200 Musters, Marc; id_orcid 0000-0002-4367-641X Swerts
Tilburg University Research Portal
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

How gender differences divide physics classroom practices:Focus group discussions with teachers and students

Marije van Amelsvoort, Rian; id_orcid 0000-0003-0632-5853 Aarts, Natascha; id_orcid 0009-0009-5826-6200 Musters, Marc; id_orcid 0000-0002-4367-641X Swerts
article en

Abstract

Discrepancies in educational outcomes and school career opportunities between boys and girls exist. Physics has long been perceived as a male-dominated field, with persistent gender differences in participation, performance, and attitudes toward the subject. Despite extensive studies, there is no comprehensive understanding of the inequities in education based on gender. Research comparing physics classroom practices of teachers and students in addressing gender differences is particularly lacking. The personal experiences of teachers and students regarding gender differences in upper secondary Dutch physics education are the scope of this study. Data were obtained from focus group discussions with teachers and students in which their ideas on gender differences in the physics classrooms were discussed. The subjects covered student learning characteristics, teacher‒student-interactions and learning materials. Overall, gender differences were mentioned primarily in teacher‒student-interactions (e.g. girls asking more questions) and in different student learning characteristics (e.g. girls demonstrating more effort, boys overestimating themselves more). Gender differences in learning materials were only addressed by teachers, not by students. Suggested improvements, by students and teachers, for physics classroom practices are discussed. These findings address the aspiration of students and teachers to receive and use practical guidelines for gender equitable physics education in their classrooms.

Tilburg University Research Portal
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.