Profiling the integrated application of multiple representations for the teaching of chemical concepts: teaching practices based on multiple representations

Abstract Multiple representations (MRs) have attracted much attention in the field of science education. When effectively integrated into teaching, they enable students to construct meaning from chemical phenomena and foster deeper conceptual understanding. However, existing studies have highlighted the difficulties teachers face in selecting and combining MRs to support students’ learning of chemical concepts. To address this issue, this study analyzes 38 high-quality chemistry concept teaching cases (HQTC) covering key concepts at both junior and senior levels. Three mainstream frameworks of MRs in science education (Johnstone’s, Gilbert’s, and Ainsworth’s) were applied to conduct multidimensional coding of MRs in these cases, which were then examined using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and hierarchical cluster analysis. The findings indicate that HQTC exhibit the following features in their use of MRs: (1) with respect to representational level, it shows an emphasis on the organic integration of macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic representations; (2) with respect to representational function, there is a focus on representations with complement and construct functions; (3) with respect to representational form, it shows a prevalence of static visual and chemical symbols, with representations overall characterized by richness and diversity. Moreover, the use of MRs varied systematically across different teaching stages, aligning with students’ cognitive needs as they progressed from preparation and initial construction to understanding, consolidation, summarization, and application. Based on these results, the study proposes practical suggestions for the design and application of MRs, with the aim of providing actionable guidance for concept teaching practices and offering an analytical framework for evaluating chemistry teaching cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00148-6
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Profiling the integrated application of multiple representations for the teaching of chemical concepts: teaching practices based on multiple representations

Yanxia Jiang
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Profiling the integrated application of multiple representations for the teaching of chemical concepts: teaching practices based on multiple representations

Yanxia Jiang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Multiple representations (MRs) have attracted much attention in the field of science education. When effectively integrated into teaching, they enable students to construct meaning from chemical phenomena and foster deeper conceptual understanding. However, existing studies have highlighted the difficulties teachers face in selecting and combining MRs to support students’ learning of chemical concepts. To address this issue, this study analyzes 38 high-quality chemistry concept teaching cases (HQTC) covering key concepts at both junior and senior levels. Three mainstream frameworks of MRs in science education (Johnstone’s, Gilbert’s, and Ainsworth’s) were applied to conduct multidimensional coding of MRs in these cases, which were then examined using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and hierarchical cluster analysis. The findings indicate that HQTC exhibit the following features in their use of MRs: (1) with respect to representational level, it shows an emphasis on the organic integration of macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic representations; (2) with respect to representational function, there is a focus on representations with complement and construct functions; (3) with respect to representational form, it shows a prevalence of static visual and chemical symbols, with representations overall characterized by richness and diversity. Moreover, the use of MRs varied systematically across different teaching stages, aligning with students’ cognitive needs as they progressed from preparation and initial construction to understanding, consolidation, summarization, and application. Based on these results, the study proposes practical suggestions for the design and application of MRs, with the aim of providing actionable guidance for concept teaching practices and offering an analytical framework for evaluating chemistry teaching cases.

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education ResearchVol. 8(1)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Shandong Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.