Implementation Challenges of a Multi-Center Financial Navigation Intervention: A Qualitative Analysis of Operational Process Data

IntroductionThe Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) intervention-a financial navigation intervention-demonstrated preliminary effectiveness. Scaling LIFT to an eight-site single-arm trial, however, posed implementation challenges that were not present in the single-site pilot study. Here, we analyze factors influencing LIFT implementation.MethodsWe used a deductive-inductive hybrid qualitative approach to analyze transcribed meeting recordings from 55 technical assistance (TA) and 23 peer support (PS) calls with financial navigators (FN). First, we deductively coded all implementation-relevant content into the five domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We then inductively generated themes and sub-themes within each of the CFIR domains. Coder reliability was assessed at multiple points during coding via coder consensus.ResultsThe qualitative analysis of nearly 78 h of TA and PS calls with FNs resulted in 18 themes and 91 sub-themes across the six CFIR domains. Outer setting themes (7 themes, 37 sub-themes) included institutional workforce problems, limited organizational resources for specific needs, and the unpredictability of external resource application success. Determinants in the inner setting (3 themes, 18 sub-themes) included existing clinical infrastructure and navigators' competing responsibilities in the clinic. Determinants in the individual domain (2 themes, 11 sub-themes) were the navigator workload and the patient motivation to engage in LIFT. Determinants in the innovation domain (2 themes, 5 sub-themes) were the intervention structure (ie, sequence and timing of LIFT activities). The most common implementation strategies (ie, process; 4 themes, 23 sub-themes) were pacing intervention content to meet patient needs, reframing the study to appeal to patients, and changing intervention delivery (eg, allowing phone visits).ConclusionsThis analysis highlights the challenges of implementing FN across multiple oncology sites, with workforce and administrative barriers being key challenges. Operational process data such as TA and PS calls can provide valuable information to guide implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Control
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748261417418
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
99.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation Challenges of a Multi-Center Financial Navigation Intervention: A Qualitative Analysis of Operational Process Data

E. Eng, C. Murray, Bridgette Thom, Arrianna Marie Planey et al.
1 citations
Cancer Control
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
99.81
article

Implementation Challenges of a Multi-Center Financial Navigation Intervention: A Qualitative Analysis of Operational Process Data

E. Eng, C. Murray, Bridgette Thom, Arrianna Marie Planey, Mindy Gellin, Neda Padilla, Stephanie B. Wheeler, Austin R. Waters, Sarah A. Birken, Donald L. Rosenstein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

IntroductionThe Lessening the Impact of Financial Toxicity (LIFT) intervention-a financial navigation intervention-demonstrated preliminary effectiveness. Scaling LIFT to an eight-site single-arm trial, however, posed implementation challenges that were not present in the single-site pilot study. Here, we analyze factors influencing LIFT implementation.MethodsWe used a deductive-inductive hybrid qualitative approach to analyze transcribed meeting recordings from 55 technical assistance (TA) and 23 peer support (PS) calls with financial navigators (FN). First, we deductively coded all implementation-relevant content into the five domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We then inductively generated themes and sub-themes within each of the CFIR domains. Coder reliability was assessed at multiple points during coding via coder consensus.ResultsThe qualitative analysis of nearly 78 h of TA and PS calls with FNs resulted in 18 themes and 91 sub-themes across the six CFIR domains. Outer setting themes (7 themes, 37 sub-themes) included institutional workforce problems, limited organizational resources for specific needs, and the unpredictability of external resource application success. Determinants in the inner setting (3 themes, 18 sub-themes) included existing clinical infrastructure and navigators' competing responsibilities in the clinic. Determinants in the individual domain (2 themes, 11 sub-themes) were the navigator workload and the patient motivation to engage in LIFT. Determinants in the innovation domain (2 themes, 5 sub-themes) were the intervention structure (ie, sequence and timing of LIFT activities). The most common implementation strategies (ie, process; 4 themes, 23 sub-themes) were pacing intervention content to meet patient needs, reframing the study to appeal to patients, and changing intervention delivery (eg, allowing phone visits).ConclusionsThis analysis highlights the challenges of implementing FN across multiple oncology sites, with workforce and administrative barriers being key challenges. Operational process data such as TA and PS calls can provide valuable information to guide implementation.

Cancer ControlVol. 33
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
99.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.