“Vox Populi” Fractional Flow Reserve (vpFFR)—Leveraging Wisdom of the Crowd for the Assessment of Hemodynamic Severity of Intermediate Coronary Lesions
<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived physiological measures has been benchmarked against two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), which are known for their poor correlation with hemodynamic lesion severity. Relying on the statistical concept of the wisdom of the crowd, we devised a human-performance reference for FFR surrogates, called <i>vox populi</i> FFR (vpFFR), and examined the comparative diagnostic performance of vpFFR, as well as 2D- and 3D-QCA, using invasively measured FFR as the gold standard. <b>Methods:</b> Analyses were performed in a single-center, prospective registry of consecutive FFR procedures. We calculated vpFFR as a mean of five independent, blinded predictions of the invasively measured FFR. Pearson's correlation coefficient and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used for diagnostic performance comparisons. <b>Results:</b> In 116 patients (156 vessels), Pearson's correlation coefficients for vpFFR, 2D-, and 3D-QCA with invasively measured FFR are 0.56, -0.26, and -0.01, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.918). vpFFR has a sensitivity of 56%, specificity of 84%, positive predictive value of 67%, and negative predictive value of 76%. It correctly classified hemodynamic severity of lesions in 73% of vessels compared to 65% and 51% for 2D- and 3D-QCA, respectively. vpFFR has a larger area under the ROC curve than 2D- and 3D-QCA for predicting positive FFR (0.78, 0.63, and 0.45, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> vpFFR, a mean value of five predictions of invasively measured FFR, has moderate diagnostic performance, superior to 2D- and 3D-QCA using FFR as the gold standard, and can be used as a human-performance reference for existing and emerging angiography-derived physiological measures.
Authors
- Nikola Lazarević
- Natalija Odanović (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0343-6195)
- Aleksandar Mandić
- V. Bojić
- Stefan Živković (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3952-4560)
- Matija Furtula (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8929-0275)
- Dobric Milan
- Vojko Mišević (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9752-6944)
- Kosta S Krupnikovic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7886-6763)
- Aleksa D. Obradović (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2509-9782)
- Samit M. Shah
- Ivan Ilic
- Dusan Borzanovic
Institutions
- Yale University (US)
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US)
- Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (RS)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diagnostics
- Published
- 2026-01-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020269
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00