“Vox Populi” Fractional Flow Reserve (vpFFR)—Leveraging Wisdom of the Crowd for the Assessment of Hemodynamic Severity of Intermediate Coronary Lesions

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived physiological measures has been benchmarked against two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), which are known for their poor correlation with hemodynamic lesion severity. Relying on the statistical concept of the wisdom of the crowd, we devised a human-performance reference for FFR surrogates, called <i>vox populi</i> FFR (vpFFR), and examined the comparative diagnostic performance of vpFFR, as well as 2D- and 3D-QCA, using invasively measured FFR as the gold standard. <b>Methods:</b> Analyses were performed in a single-center, prospective registry of consecutive FFR procedures. We calculated vpFFR as a mean of five independent, blinded predictions of the invasively measured FFR. Pearson's correlation coefficient and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used for diagnostic performance comparisons. <b>Results:</b> In 116 patients (156 vessels), Pearson's correlation coefficients for vpFFR, 2D-, and 3D-QCA with invasively measured FFR are 0.56, -0.26, and -0.01, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.918). vpFFR has a sensitivity of 56%, specificity of 84%, positive predictive value of 67%, and negative predictive value of 76%. It correctly classified hemodynamic severity of lesions in 73% of vessels compared to 65% and 51% for 2D- and 3D-QCA, respectively. vpFFR has a larger area under the ROC curve than 2D- and 3D-QCA for predicting positive FFR (0.78, 0.63, and 0.45, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> vpFFR, a mean value of five predictions of invasively measured FFR, has moderate diagnostic performance, superior to 2D- and 3D-QCA using FFR as the gold standard, and can be used as a human-performance reference for existing and emerging angiography-derived physiological measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020269
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Vox Populi” Fractional Flow Reserve (vpFFR)—Leveraging Wisdom of the Crowd for the Assessment of Hemodynamic Severity of Intermediate Coronary Lesions

Nikola Lazarević, Natalija Odanović, Aleksandar Mandić, V. Bojić et al.
Diagnostics
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

“Vox Populi” Fractional Flow Reserve (vpFFR)—Leveraging Wisdom of the Crowd for the Assessment of Hemodynamic Severity of Intermediate Coronary Lesions

Nikola Lazarević, Natalija Odanović, Aleksandar Mandić, V. Bojić, Stefan Živković, Matija Furtula, Dobric Milan, Vojko Mišević, Kosta S Krupnikovic, Aleksa D. Obradović, Samit M. Shah, Ivan Ilic, Dusan Borzanovic
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived physiological measures has been benchmarked against two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), which are known for their poor correlation with hemodynamic lesion severity. Relying on the statistical concept of the wisdom of the crowd, we devised a human-performance reference for FFR surrogates, called <i>vox populi</i> FFR (vpFFR), and examined the comparative diagnostic performance of vpFFR, as well as 2D- and 3D-QCA, using invasively measured FFR as the gold standard. <b>Methods:</b> Analyses were performed in a single-center, prospective registry of consecutive FFR procedures. We calculated vpFFR as a mean of five independent, blinded predictions of the invasively measured FFR. Pearson's correlation coefficient and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used for diagnostic performance comparisons. <b>Results:</b> In 116 patients (156 vessels), Pearson's correlation coefficients for vpFFR, 2D-, and 3D-QCA with invasively measured FFR are 0.56, -0.26, and -0.01, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.918). vpFFR has a sensitivity of 56%, specificity of 84%, positive predictive value of 67%, and negative predictive value of 76%. It correctly classified hemodynamic severity of lesions in 73% of vessels compared to 65% and 51% for 2D- and 3D-QCA, respectively. vpFFR has a larger area under the ROC curve than 2D- and 3D-QCA for predicting positive FFR (0.78, 0.63, and 0.45, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> vpFFR, a mean value of five predictions of invasively measured FFR, has moderate diagnostic performance, superior to 2D- and 3D-QCA using FFR as the gold standard, and can be used as a human-performance reference for existing and emerging angiography-derived physiological measures.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(2)
Yale University (US), University of Belgrade (RS), VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US), Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (RS)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.