How to estimate overall population trends when sites show varying population counts over time?

Population trends can be used to assess the conservation status of a species. Current methods used for estimating population trends have drawbacks when it comes to estimating a robust supra-regional trend from available population monitoring data. Because most monitoring data are collected from many subpopulations rather than a single homogeneous population, the population-level data can be highly heterogeneous with respect to the dynamics of each subpopulation over time. Thus, a supra-regional population trend should represent the common trend across all subpopulations like a global smoother in a hierarchical generalized additive model (HGAM) does. We show and compare how commonly used population trend regression models and HGAMs perform when applied to (i) simulated data consisting of subpopulations with homogeneous versus heterogeneous population dynamics and (ii) real-world data of the Greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis monitored in hibernacula throughout Germany over a 34-year period. The true population trend is significantly overestimated in models that ignore subpopulation structure and the inflated overdispersion inherent in monitoring data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114588
Primary Topic
Census and Population Estimation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to estimate overall population trends when sites show varying population counts over time?

Saskia Schirmer, Marcus Fritze, Alexander Scheuerlein
Ecological Indicators
Census and Population Estimation
article

How to estimate overall population trends when sites show varying population counts over time?

Saskia Schirmer, Marcus Fritze, Alexander Scheuerlein
article en

Abstract

Population trends can be used to assess the conservation status of a species. Current methods used for estimating population trends have drawbacks when it comes to estimating a robust supra-regional trend from available population monitoring data. Because most monitoring data are collected from many subpopulations rather than a single homogeneous population, the population-level data can be highly heterogeneous with respect to the dynamics of each subpopulation over time. Thus, a supra-regional population trend should represent the common trend across all subpopulations like a global smoother in a hierarchical generalized additive model (HGAM) does. We show and compare how commonly used population trend regression models and HGAMs perform when applied to (i) simulated data consisting of subpopulations with homogeneous versus heterogeneous population dynamics and (ii) real-world data of the Greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis monitored in hibernacula throughout Germany over a 34-year period. The true population trend is significantly overestimated in models that ignore subpopulation structure and the inflated overdispersion inherent in monitoring data.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 183
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Census and Population Estimation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.