Mapping the drivers of press freedom: A structural analysis of the world press freedom index

This study examines the interdependent relationships among the five dimensions of the World Press Freedom (WPF) Index—legal, political, sociocultural, safety, and economic contexts. Using 2024 WPF data, a three-stage analytical framework integrates expectation–maximization clustering, Bayesian network classification, and partial least-squares connectivity analysis. The results reveal that legal safeguards and journalist safety are the most influential drivers of press freedom, while political and economic contexts function as key mediating mechanisms that transmit institutional and sociocultural effects to overall outcomes. Sociocultural openness also contributes meaningfully to system performance. To enhance policy relevance, importance–performance mapping identifies legal and political dimensions as high-impact yet underperforming priorities for reform. The findings advance media-governance theory by elucidating the systemic architecture of press freedom and provide actionable insights for strengthening institutional safeguards, political transparency, and sustainable media independence worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849261418345
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the drivers of press freedom: A structural analysis of the world press freedom index

Boonlert Jitmaneeroj
Journalism
Media Influence and Politics
article

Mapping the drivers of press freedom: A structural analysis of the world press freedom index

Boonlert Jitmaneeroj
article en

Abstract

This study examines the interdependent relationships among the five dimensions of the World Press Freedom (WPF) Index—legal, political, sociocultural, safety, and economic contexts. Using 2024 WPF data, a three-stage analytical framework integrates expectation–maximization clustering, Bayesian network classification, and partial least-squares connectivity analysis. The results reveal that legal safeguards and journalist safety are the most influential drivers of press freedom, while political and economic contexts function as key mediating mechanisms that transmit institutional and sociocultural effects to overall outcomes. Sociocultural openness also contributes meaningfully to system performance. To enhance policy relevance, importance–performance mapping identifies legal and political dimensions as high-impact yet underperforming priorities for reform. The findings advance media-governance theory by elucidating the systemic architecture of press freedom and provide actionable insights for strengthening institutional safeguards, political transparency, and sustainable media independence worldwide.

Journalism
Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.