The customary prohibition of the mandatory death penalty in international law

ABSTRACT The mandatory death penalty denotes the automatic imposition of capital punishment for certain predetermined offences, without regard for the circumstances of a crime, the personal conditions of the defendants, or the factual context of individual cases. Although the practice is highly controversial for its infringements upon the right to life and the right to a fair trial, it remains uncertain whether public international law contains a universal prohibition against it. This article argues that such a prohibition does exist, taking the form of customary international law. To substantiate this claim, the article provides a detailed analysis of state practice and other relevant evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Rights Law Review
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaf047
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The customary prohibition of the mandatory death penalty in international law

Li-Yen Peng
Human Rights Law Review
International Law and Human Rights
article

The customary prohibition of the mandatory death penalty in international law

Li-Yen Peng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The mandatory death penalty denotes the automatic imposition of capital punishment for certain predetermined offences, without regard for the circumstances of a crime, the personal conditions of the defendants, or the factual context of individual cases. Although the practice is highly controversial for its infringements upon the right to life and the right to a fair trial, it remains uncertain whether public international law contains a universal prohibition against it. This article argues that such a prohibition does exist, taking the form of customary international law. To substantiate this claim, the article provides a detailed analysis of state practice and other relevant evidence.

Human Rights Law ReviewVol. 26(1)
Bulgarian Science Fund (BG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.