Skin Substitutes: Ushering in a New Era of Transition from Traditional Dressings to Bioprinted Scaffolds

3D bioprinting has revolutionized wound management by addressing the clinical challenges posed by chronic wounds and acute skin defects. While traditional skin substitutes serve critical roles in wound healing, current research focuses on optimizing bioprinting techniques, bioink formulations, and functional biological dressings to enhance tissue regeneration. The field is rapidly advancing through integration with nanotechnology, organoid technology, and microfluidics, while emerging approaches such as AI-assisted, in situ, and 4D bioprinting offer new therapeutic dimensions. This technological evolution necessitates continued innovation to overcome the existing limitations in clinical translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Bio Materials
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.5c01879
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Skin Substitutes: Ushering in a New Era of Transition from Traditional Dressings to Bioprinted Scaffolds

Jide Jin, Minliang Chen, Pianpian Lin, Yiming Wang et al.
ACS Applied Bio Materials
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Skin Substitutes: Ushering in a New Era of Transition from Traditional Dressings to Bioprinted Scaffolds

Jide Jin, Minliang Chen, Pianpian Lin, Yiming Wang, Hongfan Ding, Fanting Meng, Guangdi Li, Guiwen Zhou, Xiao Yan Xu, Wensi Wu, Qiang Fu
article en

Abstract

3D bioprinting has revolutionized wound management by addressing the clinical challenges posed by chronic wounds and acute skin defects. While traditional skin substitutes serve critical roles in wound healing, current research focuses on optimizing bioprinting techniques, bioink formulations, and functional biological dressings to enhance tissue regeneration. The field is rapidly advancing through integration with nanotechnology, organoid technology, and microfluidics, while emerging approaches such as AI-assisted, in situ, and 4D bioprinting offer new therapeutic dimensions. This technological evolution necessitates continued innovation to overcome the existing limitations in clinical translation.

ACS Applied Bio MaterialsVol. 9(3)
Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN), Plastic Surgery Hospital (CN), Beijing Radiation Center (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Skin Substitutes: Ushering in a New Era of Transition from Traditional Dressings to Bioprinted Scaffolds — Jide Jin, Minliang Chen, et al. · ACS Applied Bio Materials (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS