Uneven regional development in a contentious world of changing global production networks: ‘chips war’ and the geopolitics of semiconductor production in the United States and Southeast Asia

Since the late 2010s, the global economy has been confronted with immense challenges – from geopolitical tensions and climate change to the COVID-19 pandemic, territorial wars, trade conflicts and so on. While the unfettered economic globalisation of the 1990s and the 2000s might be over, a renewed interest in the global shift of industrial production (back to developed countries and their allies) has now preoccupied the policy priorities of many state authorities and regional institutions. In this context of a contentious world of production, the changing industrial organisation of economies activities has become one of the most disruptive forces shaping regional development. This paper first explores conceptually this recent change in relation to three important extra-regional processes that might shape the diverse trajectories of regional evolution and development beyond the mid-2020s: (1) policy regimes ‘elsewhere’; (2) the changing dynamics of strategic coupling; and (3) demand-led market shifts. It then offers some empirical illustrations through examining the so-called ‘chips war’ via state-led industrial policy and the reshoring of semiconductor production from Northeast Asia to the United States and Western Europe and new sites in Southeast Asia and their implications for respective host regions at the sub-national scale. My overall contention is that such a reactive political response to economic (over)globalisation is not necessarily a positive solution to addressing uneven regional development. There are likely unintended consequences of industrial policy that might exacerbate, rather than mitigate, uneven regional development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Studies Regional Science
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2025.2600174
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
53.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uneven regional development in a contentious world of changing global production networks: ‘chips war’ and the geopolitics of semiconductor production in the United States and Southeast Asia

Henry Wai-chung Yeung
1 citations
Regional Studies Regional Science
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
53.89
article

Uneven regional development in a contentious world of changing global production networks: ‘chips war’ and the geopolitics of semiconductor production in the United States and Southeast Asia

Henry Wai-chung Yeung
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since the late 2010s, the global economy has been confronted with immense challenges – from geopolitical tensions and climate change to the COVID-19 pandemic, territorial wars, trade conflicts and so on. While the unfettered economic globalisation of the 1990s and the 2000s might be over, a renewed interest in the global shift of industrial production (back to developed countries and their allies) has now preoccupied the policy priorities of many state authorities and regional institutions. In this context of a contentious world of production, the changing industrial organisation of economies activities has become one of the most disruptive forces shaping regional development. This paper first explores conceptually this recent change in relation to three important extra-regional processes that might shape the diverse trajectories of regional evolution and development beyond the mid-2020s: (1) policy regimes ‘elsewhere’; (2) the changing dynamics of strategic coupling; and (3) demand-led market shifts. It then offers some empirical illustrations through examining the so-called ‘chips war’ via state-led industrial policy and the reshoring of semiconductor production from Northeast Asia to the United States and Western Europe and new sites in Southeast Asia and their implications for respective host regions at the sub-national scale. My overall contention is that such a reactive political response to economic (over)globalisation is not necessarily a positive solution to addressing uneven regional development. There are likely unintended consequences of industrial policy that might exacerbate, rather than mitigate, uneven regional development.

Regional Studies Regional ScienceVol. 13(1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
53.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.