Privacy designs, technological sovereignty and digital pandemic response-ability

This article tells the story of digital contact tracing in Norway and ensuing public controversies over encompassing surveillance. The resolution of the controversy came to turn predominantly on matters of privacy and measures provided through privacy-by-design. We relate this to recent turns towards design-based governance, which have also found their way into the field of Responsible Innovation. We contend that there is a need for Responsible Innovation scholarship and practice to pay closer scrutiny to institutional and political implications when governance issues become subject to design- and engineering-based approaches. In particular, debates about control over the digital infrastructures used to manage public health emergencies were reframed as matters of technological sovereignty, bringing to the fore what we call infrastructural response-ability. Finally, through a comparison with similar developments in France, we contrast this with a ‘distrust-by-design’ approach that sheds light on the broader politics around innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2025.2611507
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privacy designs, technological sovereignty and digital pandemic response-ability

Kjetil Rommetveit, Maciej Otmianowski, Niels Van Dijk
Journal of Responsible Innovation
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
article

Privacy designs, technological sovereignty and digital pandemic response-ability

Kjetil Rommetveit, Maciej Otmianowski, Niels Van Dijk
article en

Abstract

This article tells the story of digital contact tracing in Norway and ensuing public controversies over encompassing surveillance. The resolution of the controversy came to turn predominantly on matters of privacy and measures provided through privacy-by-design. We relate this to recent turns towards design-based governance, which have also found their way into the field of Responsible Innovation. We contend that there is a need for Responsible Innovation scholarship and practice to pay closer scrutiny to institutional and political implications when governance issues become subject to design- and engineering-based approaches. In particular, debates about control over the digital infrastructures used to manage public health emergencies were reframed as matters of technological sovereignty, bringing to the fore what we call infrastructural response-ability. Finally, through a comparison with similar developments in France, we contrast this with a ‘distrust-by-design’ approach that sheds light on the broader politics around innovation.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 13(1)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Bergen (NO)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.