A systematic literature review and (network) meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus aminoglycosides/polymyxins and ceftazidime/avibactam for treating adult patients with multidrug-resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> i

Multidrug-resistantant (MDR) <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> is a major public health concern necessitating new antimicrobials. There are new antimicrobials available with activity against MDR-<i>P. aeruginosa,</i> but there is a lack of robust evidence synthesis to guide clinical decision-making for patients with infections caused by MDR-<i>P. aeruginosa</i>. This study, which was supported by Merck & Co., Inc., aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) compared to other commonly used therapies (aminoglycosides/polymyxins and ceftazidime/avibactam [CZA]) among adults with MDR-<i>P. aeruginosa</i> infections. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify real-world clinical and healthcare-resource utilization outcomes for C/T versus comparators. A feasibility assessment excluded comparators that were not aminoglycosides/polymyxins or CZA due to insufficient data for comparisons. A meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted on the included studies. Heterogeneity between the studies was calculated using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic. The NMA displayed statistically significant results for clinical cure (odds ratio [OR] = 0.308, 95% CI = 0.168-0.515) and all-cause mortality (OR = 1.651, 95% CI = 1.114-2.501) for C/T versus aminoglycosides/polymyxins, while microbiological cure and length of stay did not display statistical significance. However, comparisons for C/T versus CZA demonstrated no statistical significance for any of the outcomes explored. These findings suggest that C/T is more likely to achieve clinical cure and less likely to result in all-cause mortality compared to aminoglycosides/polymyxins. In the absence of head-to-head trials, this real-world evidence indicates potential advantages of using C/T over aminoglycosides/polymyxins for MDR-<i>P. aeruginosa</i> infections. Larger prospective studies with standardized outcome measures are needed to further inform clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00735-25
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic literature review and (network) meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus aminoglycosides/polymyxins and ceftazidime/avibactam for treating adult patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa i

Maria Chrysostomou, Emre Yücel, Hannah Collings, Alex Hirst et al.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

A systematic literature review and (network) meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus aminoglycosides/polymyxins and ceftazidime/avibactam for treating adult patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa i

Maria Chrysostomou, Emre Yücel, Hannah Collings, Alex Hirst, Medi Stone, Thomas Iodise, Todd Edward Waldenberg
article en

Abstract

Multidrug-resistantant (MDR) <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> is a major public health concern necessitating new antimicrobials. There are new antimicrobials available with activity against MDR-<i>P. aeruginosa,</i> but there is a lack of robust evidence synthesis to guide clinical decision-making for patients with infections caused by MDR-<i>P. aeruginosa</i>. This study, which was supported by Merck & Co., Inc., aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) compared to other commonly used therapies (aminoglycosides/polymyxins and ceftazidime/avibactam [CZA]) among adults with MDR-<i>P. aeruginosa</i> infections. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify real-world clinical and healthcare-resource utilization outcomes for C/T versus comparators. A feasibility assessment excluded comparators that were not aminoglycosides/polymyxins or CZA due to insufficient data for comparisons. A meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted on the included studies. Heterogeneity between the studies was calculated using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic. The NMA displayed statistically significant results for clinical cure (odds ratio [OR] = 0.308, 95% CI = 0.168-0.515) and all-cause mortality (OR = 1.651, 95% CI = 1.114-2.501) for C/T versus aminoglycosides/polymyxins, while microbiological cure and length of stay did not display statistical significance. However, comparisons for C/T versus CZA demonstrated no statistical significance for any of the outcomes explored. These findings suggest that C/T is more likely to achieve clinical cure and less likely to result in all-cause mortality compared to aminoglycosides/polymyxins. In the absence of head-to-head trials, this real-world evidence indicates potential advantages of using C/T over aminoglycosides/polymyxins for MDR-<i>P. aeruginosa</i> infections. Larger prospective studies with standardized outcome measures are needed to further inform clinical decision-making.

Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyVol. 70(2)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.