Testing the cosmic distance duality relation using model-independent approach

Abstract In this work, we test the cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR) using the arbitrary redshift pivot Padé-(2,1) expansion methodology developed in Ref Fazzari et al. http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16196 . This approach allows us to constrain the cosmography parameters and test the CDDR at any redshift. Further, it does not rely on data reconstructions or extrapolations of the cosmography parameters to higher redshifts. We employ observational data from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Baryon Acoustic Oscillation dataset, cosmic chronometers (CC), and Type Ia supernovae from the Pantheon Plus (PP) and Dark Energy Survey Year 5 (DESY5) compilations. We find no significant deviations from the standard CDDR relation in the range $$0\lesssim z \lesssim 1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>≲</mml:mo> <mml:mi>z</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≲</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> when considering DESI $$+r_d$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dataset in combination with PP+CC and DESY5+CC datasets. However, on imposing a Gaussian prior on $$M_B \in \mathcal {N}(-19.253, 0.027)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>19.253</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.027</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (instead of treating it as a free parameter) in the dataset combination PP+CC, we find CDDR violation at a level of $$(3-5)\sigma .$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15267-7
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the cosmic distance duality relation using model-independent approach

Sujit Kumar Dalui, Suborna Barua, R. Okazaki, Shantanu Desai
The European Physical Journal C
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

Testing the cosmic distance duality relation using model-independent approach

Sujit Kumar Dalui, Suborna Barua, R. Okazaki, Shantanu Desai
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we test the cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR) using the arbitrary redshift pivot Padé-(2,1) expansion methodology developed in Ref Fazzari et al. http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16196 . This approach allows us to constrain the cosmography parameters and test the CDDR at any redshift. Further, it does not rely on data reconstructions or extrapolations of the cosmography parameters to higher redshifts. We employ observational data from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Baryon Acoustic Oscillation dataset, cosmic chronometers (CC), and Type Ia supernovae from the Pantheon Plus (PP) and Dark Energy Survey Year 5 (DESY5) compilations. We find no significant deviations from the standard CDDR relation in the range $$0\lesssim z \lesssim 1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>≲</mml:mo> <mml:mi>z</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≲</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> when considering DESI $$+r_d$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dataset in combination with PP+CC and DESY5+CC datasets. However, on imposing a Gaussian prior on $$M_B \in \mathcal {N}(-19.253, 0.027)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>19.253</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.027</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (instead of treating it as a free parameter) in the dataset combination PP+CC, we find CDDR violation at a level of $$(3-5)\sigma .$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math>

The European Physical Journal CVol. 86(1)
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IN), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India, University Grants Commission, Ministry of Electronics and Information technology, Japan Student Services Organization, Sakura Science Exchange Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.