Promising Return Practices

This concept note, prepared as part of WP9 of the GAPs project, aims to identify and categorise “good” and “promising” practices regarding coerced returns. Synthesising findings from GAPs Work Packages 2-9, it proposes both an analytical framework and a standardised structure to support a comparative and multi-dimensional mapping of returnrelated practices across selected countries. This report systematically presents an inventory of good and promising practices related to return governance from 12 countries, using a common analytical framework. We define these practices as those that actively promote the rights, dignity, and agency of migrants while also contributing to effective and sustainable return governance. In this inventory, each practice is analysed based on its context (geography, duration, target group, return stage), concise description, return governance implementation challenges it addresses, the principles referenced, concrete benefits, impacts, key lessons learned, and relevant recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18228303
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promising Return Practices

Soner Barthoma, Zeynep Şahin Mencütek, Rodrigo Bolaños Suárez
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

Promising Return Practices

Soner Barthoma, Zeynep Şahin Mencütek, Rodrigo Bolaños Suárez
article en

Abstract

This concept note, prepared as part of WP9 of the GAPs project, aims to identify and categorise “good” and “promising” practices regarding coerced returns. Synthesising findings from GAPs Work Packages 2-9, it proposes both an analytical framework and a standardised structure to support a comparative and multi-dimensional mapping of returnrelated practices across selected countries. This report systematically presents an inventory of good and promising practices related to return governance from 12 countries, using a common analytical framework. We define these practices as those that actively promote the rights, dignity, and agency of migrants while also contributing to effective and sustainable return governance. In this inventory, each practice is analysed based on its context (geography, duration, target group, return stage), concise description, return governance implementation challenges it addresses, the principles referenced, concrete benefits, impacts, key lessons learned, and relevant recommendations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Uppsala University (SE), BICC - Bonn International Centre for Conflict Studies (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Promising Return Practices — Soner Barthoma, Zeynep Şahin Mencütek, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS