Fair Division of Indivisible Items: Envy-Freeness vs. Efficiency Revisited
We study conflicts between envy-based fairness and efficiency for allocating indivisible items under additive utilities. We formalize several small, transparent instances showing that standard envy-freeness (EF) or its relaxations EFX and EFX0—i.e., envy-freeness up to any item, where EFX restricts attention to positively valued items and EFX0 allows removing zero-valued items as well—can conflict with Pareto-optimality (PO), maximin (MM), or maximum Nash welfare (MNW). Normatively, we argue that envy-freeness (even as EFX or EFX0) is not a panacea for allocating indivisible items and should be weighed against efficiency and welfare criteria.
Authors
- Christian Klamler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1225-5943)
- Steven J. Brams
- D. Marc Kilgour
Institutions
- University of Graz (AT)
- New York University (US)
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Games
- Published
- 2026-01-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/g17010004
- Primary Topic
- Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00