Between transparency and protection of privacy: the impact of CJEU jurisprudence on the regulation of beneficial ownership registers

Abstract This article examines the profound impact of the landmark judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in WM and Sovim SA v Luxembourg Business Registers on the regulation and enforcement of Beneficial Ownership Registers in the Czech Republic. The judgment, by invalidating the provision for unrestricted public access, fundamentally shifted the concept of transparency from an absolute good to a qualified right, requiring strict proportionality with the fundamental rights to privacy and data protection. Due to subsequent legislative inaction, the Czech supreme courts intervened, establishing a doctrine of “functional connection” between the duty to register and the automatic public disclosure. This judicial activism declared the public-law enforcement mechanism (including sanctions and corporate penalties) for nonregistration to be unenforceable, as compliance would inevitably lead to a violation of constitutional rights.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Trusts & Trustees
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttaf091
Primary Topic
Energy Law and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between transparency and protection of privacy: the impact of CJEU jurisprudence on the regulation of beneficial ownership registers

Karel Brychta
Trusts & Trustees
Energy Law and Policy
article

Between transparency and protection of privacy: the impact of CJEU jurisprudence on the regulation of beneficial ownership registers

Karel Brychta
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the profound impact of the landmark judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in WM and Sovim SA v Luxembourg Business Registers on the regulation and enforcement of Beneficial Ownership Registers in the Czech Republic. The judgment, by invalidating the provision for unrestricted public access, fundamentally shifted the concept of transparency from an absolute good to a qualified right, requiring strict proportionality with the fundamental rights to privacy and data protection. Due to subsequent legislative inaction, the Czech supreme courts intervened, establishing a doctrine of “functional connection” between the duty to register and the automatic public disclosure. This judicial activism declared the public-law enforcement mechanism (including sanctions and corporate penalties) for nonregistration to be unenforceable, as compliance would inevitably lead to a violation of constitutional rights.

Trusts & TrusteesVol. 32(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Energy Law and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.