Stakeholder Support for Regulatory Harmonization and Expanded Nuclear Power: Outcomes of HPS/NCRP Open Forums

On June 9 th and 10 th , 2025 the Health Physics Society (HPS) and National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) jointly sponsored two open forums with the hopes of discussing and responding to constituent beliefs regarding a series of nuclear-related Executive Orders (EOs). The HPS and NCRP leaders were joined by members from the American Academy of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), and the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) as panelists to help respond and moderate the forums. The forums focused on three of the nine relevant EOs, and, while varying opinions were shared, three common themes were strongly supported: First, many of the constituents support change, particularly regulatory harmonization (205/212, 97%), and the time to make changes [now] is appropriate due to these EOs. Second, the constituents believe that these EOs will have a significant impact on the nuclear fields (420/468, 90%). Third, the constituents strongly support the United States in increasing its use of nuclear power (236/245, 96%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Physics
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/hp.0000000000002056
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder Support for Regulatory Harmonization and Expanded Nuclear Power: Outcomes of HPS/NCRP Open Forums

E.M. Brackett, C.A. Wilson, E.A. Caffrey, K.A. Higley
Health Physics
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Stakeholder Support for Regulatory Harmonization and Expanded Nuclear Power: Outcomes of HPS/NCRP Open Forums

E.M. Brackett, C.A. Wilson, E.A. Caffrey, K.A. Higley
article en

Abstract

On June 9 th and 10 th , 2025 the Health Physics Society (HPS) and National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) jointly sponsored two open forums with the hopes of discussing and responding to constituent beliefs regarding a series of nuclear-related Executive Orders (EOs). The HPS and NCRP leaders were joined by members from the American Academy of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), and the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) as panelists to help respond and moderate the forums. The forums focused on three of the nine relevant EOs, and, while varying opinions were shared, three common themes were strongly supported: First, many of the constituents support change, particularly regulatory harmonization (205/212, 97%), and the time to make changes [now] is appropriate due to these EOs. Second, the constituents believe that these EOs will have a significant impact on the nuclear fields (420/468, 90%). Third, the constituents strongly support the United States in increasing its use of nuclear power (236/245, 96%).

Health Physics
Oregon State University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stakeholder Support for Regulatory Harmonization and Expanded Nuclear Power: Outcomes of HPS/NCRP Open Forums — E.M. Brackett, C.A. Wilson, et al. · Health Physics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS