Do soft-skills courses pay for individuals? Evidence from German matched data

Abstract Soft skills are widely promoted as levers for productivity and as enablers for digital and green transitions. Linking soft-skills training courses with German employer–employee records for 2010–2020, we track 5,439 full-time workers, including 549 participants in non-formal soft-skills training typically financed by employers. A staggered event-study design finds no post-training changes in daily wages, span of control, leadership status, or job satisfaction for up to three years. In Germany’s compressed-wage setting, where firms hold considerable monopsony power, this pattern is consistent with two interpretations: either these courses produce relatively small productivity effects, or firms capture most of any productivity gains rather than sharing them through higher pay. We discuss how portable Individual Learning Accounts and targeted subsidies could, in principle, strengthen worker returns, while acknowledging that more evidence on productivity effects is needed before drawing firm policy conclusions. JEL codes: J24; J28; J31; M53; I26

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirical research in vocational education and training
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-026-00210-1
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do soft-skills courses pay for individuals? Evidence from German matched data

Samuel Mühlemann, Mahdi Gholami
Empirical research in vocational education and training
Higher Education and Employability
article

Do soft-skills courses pay for individuals? Evidence from German matched data

Samuel Mühlemann, Mahdi Gholami
article en

Abstract

Abstract Soft skills are widely promoted as levers for productivity and as enablers for digital and green transitions. Linking soft-skills training courses with German employer–employee records for 2010–2020, we track 5,439 full-time workers, including 549 participants in non-formal soft-skills training typically financed by employers. A staggered event-study design finds no post-training changes in daily wages, span of control, leadership status, or job satisfaction for up to three years. In Germany’s compressed-wage setting, where firms hold considerable monopsony power, this pattern is consistent with two interpretations: either these courses produce relatively small productivity effects, or firms capture most of any productivity gains rather than sharing them through higher pay. We discuss how portable Individual Learning Accounts and targeted subsidies could, in principle, strengthen worker returns, while acknowledging that more evidence on productivity effects is needed before drawing firm policy conclusions. JEL codes: J24; J28; J31; M53; I26

Empirical research in vocational education and trainingVol. 18(1)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Higher Education and Employability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do soft-skills courses pay for individuals? Evidence from German matched data — Samuel Mühlemann, Mahdi Gholami · Empirical research in vocational education and training (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS